# 7.1 Electric potential energy  (Page 4/5)

 Page 4 / 5
${W}_{2}=k\frac{{q}_{1}{q}_{2}}{{r}_{12}}=\left(9.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{9}\frac{\text{N}·{\text{m}}^{2}}{{\text{C}}^{2}}\right)\frac{\left(2.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)\left(3.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}=5.4\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}\text{.}$

Step 3. While keeping the charges of $+2.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}$ and $+3.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}$ fixed in their places, bring in the $+4.0\text{-}\mu \text{C}$ charge to $\left(x,y,z\right)=\left(1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm},1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm},0\right)$ ( [link] ). The work done in this step is

$\begin{array}{cc}{W}_{3}\hfill & =k\frac{{q}_{1}{q}_{3}}{{r}_{13}}+k\frac{{q}_{2}{q}_{3}}{{r}_{23}}\hfill \\ & =\left(9.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{9}\frac{\text{N}·{\text{m}}^{2}}{{\text{C}}^{2}}\right)\left[\frac{\left(2.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)\left(4.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{\sqrt{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}+\frac{\left(3.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)\left(4.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}\right]=15.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}\text{.}\hfill \end{array}$

Step 4. Finally, while keeping the first three charges in their places, bring the $+5.0\text{-}\mu \text{C}$ charge to $\left(x,y,z\right)=\left(0,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm},\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}0\right)$ ( [link] ). The work done here is

$\begin{array}{cc}{W}_{4}\hfill & =k{q}_{4}\left[\frac{{q}_{1}}{{r}_{14}}+\frac{{q}_{2}}{{r}_{24}}+\frac{{q}_{3}}{{r}_{34}}\right],\hfill \\ & =\left(9.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{9}\frac{\text{N}·{\text{m}}^{2}}{{\text{C}}^{2}}\right)\left(5.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)\left[\frac{\left(2.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}+\frac{\left(3.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{\sqrt{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}+\frac{\left(4.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-6}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{C}\right)}{1.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}\right]=36.5\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}\text{.}\hfill \end{array}$

Hence, the total work done by the applied force in assembling the four charges is equal to the sum of the work in bringing each charge from infinity to its final position:

${W}_{\text{T}}={W}_{1}+{W}_{2}+{W}_{3}+{W}_{4}=0+5.4\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}+15.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}+36.5\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}=57.8\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}\text{.}$

## Significance

The work on each charge depends only on its pairwise interactions with the other charges. No more complicated interactions need to be considered; the work on the third charge only depends on its interaction with the first and second charges, the interaction between the first and second charge does not affect the third.

Check Your Understanding Is the electrical potential energy of two point charges positive or negative if the charges are of the same sign? Opposite signs? How does this relate to the work necessary to bring the charges into proximity from infinity?

positive, negative, and these quantities are the same as the work you would need to do to bring the charges in from infinity

Note that the electrical potential energy is positive if the two charges are of the same type, either positive or negative, and negative if the two charges are of opposite types. This makes sense if you think of the change in the potential energy $\text{Δ}U$ as you bring the two charges closer or move them farther apart. Depending on the relative types of charges, you may have to work on the system or the system would do work on you, that is, your work is either positive or negative. If you have to do positive work on the system (actually push the charges closer), then the energy of the system should increase. If you bring two positive charges or two negative charges closer, you have to do positive work on the system, which raises their potential energy. Since potential energy is proportional to 1/ r , the potential energy goes up when r goes down between two positive or two negative charges.

On the other hand, if you bring a positive and a negative charge nearer, you have to do negative work on the system (the charges are pulling you), which means that you take energy away from the system. This reduces the potential energy. Since potential energy is negative in the case of a positive and a negative charge pair, the increase in 1/ r makes the potential energy more negative, which is the same as a reduction in potential energy.

The result from [link] may be extended to systems with any arbitrary number of charges. In this case, it is most convenient to write the formula as

${W}_{12\cdots N}=\frac{k}{2}\sum _{i}^{N}\sum _{j}^{N}\frac{{q}_{i}{q}_{j}}{{r}_{ij}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{for}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}i\ne j.$

The factor of 1/2 accounts for adding each pair of charges twice.

## Summary

• The work done to move a charge from point A to B in an electric field is path independent, and the work around a closed path is zero. Therefore, the electric field and electric force are conservative.
• We can define an electric potential energy, which between point charges is $U\left(r\right)=k\frac{qQ}{r}$ , with the zero reference taken to be at infinity.
• The superposition principle holds for electric potential energy; the potential energy of a system of multiple charges is the sum of the potential energies of the individual pairs.

## Conceptual questions

Would electric potential energy be meaningful if the electric field were not conservative?

No. We can only define potential energies for conservative fields.

Why do we need to be careful about work done on the system versus work done by the system in calculations?

Does the order in which we assemble a system of point charges affect the total work done?

No, though certain orderings may be simpler to compute.

## Problems

Consider a charge ${Q}_{1}\left(+5.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}\right)$ fixed at a site with another charge ${Q}_{2}$ (charge $+3.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}$ , mass $6.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{g}\right)$ moving in the neighboring space. (a) Evaluate the potential energy of ${Q}_{2}$ when it is 4.0 cm from ${Q}_{1}.$ (b) If ${Q}_{2}$ starts from rest from a point 4.0 cm from ${Q}_{1},$ what will be its speed when it is 8.0 cm from ${Q}_{1}$ ? ( Note: ${Q}_{1}$ is held fixed in its place.)

a. $U=3.4\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J;}$
b. $\frac{1}{2}m{v}^{2}=k{Q}_{1}{Q}_{2}\left(\frac{1}{{r}_{i}}-\frac{1}{{r}_{f}}\right)\to v=750\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m/s}$

Two charges ${Q}_{1}\left(+2.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}\right)$ and ${Q}_{2}\left(+2.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}\right)$ are placed symmetrically along the x -axis at $x=±3.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm}$ . Consider a charge ${Q}_{3}$ of charge $+4.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mu \text{C}$ and mass 10.0 mg moving along the y -axis. If ${Q}_{3}$ starts from rest at $y=2.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm,}$ what is its speed when it reaches $y=4.00\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{cm?}$

To form a hydrogen atom, a proton is fixed at a point and an electron is brought from far away to a distance of $0.529\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-10}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m,}$ the average distance between proton and electron in a hydrogen atom. How much work is done?

$U=4.36\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-18}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{J}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$

(a) What is the average power output of a heart defibrillator that dissipates 400 J of energy in 10.0 ms? (b) Considering the high-power output, why doesn’t the defibrillator produce serious burns?

Newton's second laws is call with
Really
Arzoodan
what is mean by thermodynamics
it is study about temperature and it's equilibrium
thiru
Its the study of heat and its relation with others kind of energy
Antonio
state caulombs law clearly
show mathematically that an electron has the greater speed than the proton when they attract each other
show mathematically that an electron has the greater speed than the proton when they attract each other
srikanta
@ezra & srikanta; for electrons: a=ke^2/(mr^2) and for protons: a=kp^2/(mr^2)
Sikandar
what is electrostatics
the study of charge at rest
Gulzar
@Hero; the study of charges at rest is the electrostatics
Sikandar
okay what is electrostatic?
Abd
charge at rest
Nawal
set of character...
Arzoodan
oky
Abd
Gauss law, electric fields, dipoles,...
Antonio
good
Abd
A proton initially at rest falls through a p.d of 25000V. what speed does it gain?
@Minister; use equation v= sq root(2×eV/m)
Sikandar
what is the reaction of heat on magnet
Magnetization decreases with increase in temperature. But in case of diamagnetic substance heat has no role on magnetization.
srikanta
what is a physical significant of electric dipole moment .
A dipole moment it's a mechanical electrical effect used in nature
Antonio
what is the uses of carbon brushes in generator
to minimize heat
constand
at what temperature is the degree Fahrenheit equal to degree Celsius
Celsius and Faharaneith are different, never equal
Antonio
find their liners express of n=a+b/T² ( plot graph n against T)
Radio Stations often advertis "instant news,,if that meens you can hear the news the instant the radio announcer speaks it is the claim true? what approximate time interval is required for a message to travel from Cairo to Aswan by radio waves (500km) (Assume the waves Casbe detected at this range )
what is growth and decay
Can someone please predict the trajectory of a point charge in a uniform electric field????
what is deference between strong force and coulomb force
how do you convert temperature in degree Celsius to Fahrenheit
kwame
Celsius x 9/5 +32
Cyclone