<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
This module teaches about multiplying binomials. Specifically about common patterns that can be memorized and using the "FOIL" method.

The following three formulae should be memorized.

x + a 2 = x 2 + 2 ax + a 2 size 12{ left (x+a right ) rSup { size 8{2} } =x rSup { size 8{2} } +2 ital "ax"+a rSup { size 8{2} } } {}
x a 2 = x 2 2 ax + a 2 size 12{ left (x - a right ) rSup { size 8{2} } =x rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 ital "ax"+a rSup { size 8{2} } } {}
x + a x a = x 2 a 2 size 12{ left (x+a right ) left (x - a right )=x rSup { size 8{2} } - a rSup { size 8{2} } } {}

It is important to have these three formulae on the top of your head. It is also nice to be able to show why these formulae work, for instance by using FOIL. But the most important thing of all is knowing what these three formulae mean, and how to use them .

These three are all “algebraic generalizations,” as discussed in the first unit on functions. That is, they are equations that hold true for any values of x size 12{x} {} and a size 12{a} {} . It may help if you think of the second equation above as standing for:

Anthing Anything Else 2 = Anything 2 2 Anything Else 2 size 12{ left ("Anthing" - "Anything Else" right ) rSup { size 8{2} } ="Anything" rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 left ("Anything Else" right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {} For instance, suppose the Anything (or x size 12{x} {} ) is 5, and the Anything Else (or a size 12{a} {} ) is 3.

x a 2 = x 2 2 ax + a 2 size 12{ left (x - a right ) rSup { size 8{2} } =x rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 ital "ax"+a rSup { size 8{2} } } {} , when x = 5 size 12{x=5} {} , a = 3 size 12{a=3} {} .

  • 5 3 2 = ? 5 2 2 3 5 + 3 2 size 12{5 - 3 rSup { size 8{2} } { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } 5 rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 left (3 right ) left (5 right )+3 rSup { size 8{2} } } {}
  • 2 2 = ? 25 30 + 9 size 12{2 rSup { size 8{2} } { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } "25" - "30"+9} {}
  • 4 = 4 size 12{4=4} {}
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

It worked! Now, let’s leave the Anything as x size 12{x} {} , but play with different values of a size 12{a} {} .

More examples of x a 2 = x 2 2 ax + a 2 size 12{ left (x - a right ) rSup { size 8{2} } =x rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 ital "ax"+a rSup { size 8{2} } } {}

a = 1 : ( x - 1 ) 2 = x 2 - 2 x + 1 a = 2 : ( x - 2 ) 2 = x 2 - 4 x + 4 a = 3 : ( x - 3 ) 2 = x 2 - 6 x + 9 a = 5 : ( x - 5 ) 2 = x 2 - 10 x + 25 a = 10 : ( x - 10 ) 2 = x 2 - 20 x + 100
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Once you’ve seen a few of these, the pattern becomes evident: the number doubles to create the middle term (the coefficient of x size 12{x} {} ), and squares to create the final term (the number).

The hardest thing about this formula is remembering to use it . For instance, suppose you are asked to expand:

2y 6 2 size 12{ left (2y - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {}

There are three ways you can approach this.

2y 6 2 , computed three different ways
Square each term FOIL Using the formula above
2y 6 2 2y 2 2 6 2y + 6 2 4y 2 24 y + 36 size 12{ matrix { {} # left (2y - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} ##={} {} # left (2y right ) rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 left (6 right ) left (2y right )+6 rSup { size 8{2} } {} ## ={} {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "24"y+"36"{}} } {} 2y 6 2y 6 2y 2y 2y 6 2y 6 + 36 4y 2 12 y 12 y + 36 4y 2 24 y + 36 size 12{ matrix { {} # left (2y - 6 right ) left (2y - 6 right ) {} ##={} {} # left (2y right ) left (2y right ) - left (2y right )6 - left (2y right )6+"36" {} ## ={} {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "12"y - "12"y+"36" {} ##={} {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "24"y+"36"{} } } {} 2y 6 2 2y 2 2 6 2y + 6 2 4y 2 24 y + 36 size 12{ matrix { {} # left (2y - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} ##={} {} # left (2y right ) rSup { size 8{2} } - 2 left (6 right ) left (2y right )+6 rSup { size 8{2} } {} ## ={} {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "24"y+"36"{}} } {}

Did it work? If a formula is true, it should work for any y size 12{y} {} -value; let’s test each one with y = 5 size 12{y=5} {} . (Note that the second two methods got the same answer, so we only need to test that once.)

2y 6 2 = ? 4y 2 36 2 5 6 2 = ? 4y 2 36 10 6 2 = ? 100 36 4 2 = ? 64 size 12{ matrix { left (2y - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "36" {} ##left (2 cdot 5 - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "36" {} ## left ("10" - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # "100" - "36" {} ##4 rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # "64"{} } } {} 2y 6 2 = ? 4y 2 24 y + 36 2 5 6 2 = ? 4 5 2 24 5 + 36 10 6 2 = ? 100 120 + 36 4 2 = ? 16 size 12{ matrix { left (2y - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # 4y rSup { size 8{2} } - "24"y+"36" {} ##left (2 cdot 5 - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # 4 left (5 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } - "24" cdot 5+"36" {} ## left ("10" - 6 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # "100" - "120"+"36" {} ##4 rSup { size 8{2} } {} # { {}={}} cSup { size 8{?} } {} # "16"{} } } {}

We conclude that squaring each term individually does not work. The other two methods both give the same answer, which works.

The first method is the easiest, of course. And it looks good. 2y 2 size 12{ left (2y right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {} is indeed 4y 2 size 12{4y rSup { size 8{2} } } {} . And 6 2 size 12{6 rSup { size 8{2} } } {} is indeed 36. But as you can see, it led us to a false answer —an algebraic generalization that did not hold up.

I just can’t stress this point enough. It sounds like a detail, but it causes errors all through Algebra II and beyond. When you’re adding or subtracting things, and then squaring them, you can’t just square them one at a time. Mathematically, x + a 2 x 2 + a 2 size 12{ left (x+a right ) rSup { size 8{2} }<>x rSup { size 8{2} } +a rSup { size 8{2} } } {} . You can confirm this with numbers all day. 7 + 3 2 = 100 size 12{ left (7+3 right ) rSup { size 8{2} } ="100"} {} , but 7 2 + 3 2 = 58 size 12{7 rSup { size 8{2} } +3 rSup { size 8{2} } ="58"} {} . They’re not the same.

So that leaves the other two methods. FOIL will never lead you astray. But the third approach, the formula, has three distinct advantages.

  1. The formula is faster than FOIL.
  2. Using these formulae is a specific case of the vital mathematical skill of using any formula—learning how to plug numbers and variables into some equation that you’ve been given, and therefore understanding the abstraction that formulae represent.
  3. Before this unit is done, we will be completing the square, which requires running that particular formula backward —which you cannot do with FOIL.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Advanced algebra ii: conceptual explanations. OpenStax CNX. May 04, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10624/1.15
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Advanced algebra ii: conceptual explanations' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask