<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
A qualitative interview study was conducted to understand how women school superintendents promote and support social justice in their school districts. Six women who were practicing superintendents in a Midwestern state participated in the study: three were African American, one was American Indian, and two women were White. The framework for the study relied on feminist standpoint theory (Harding, 2004) and Furman’s (2003) ethic of community grounded the data analysis. The paper details the research findings in three distinct areas: how the women defined social justice issues in their school districts, how they work in unique ways to overcome educational practices that were unjust for students and staff, and how they work to establish community within their districts.

This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and endorsed by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a significant contribution to the scholarship and practice of education administration. In addition to publication in the Connexions Content Commons, this module is published in the NCPEA Education Leadership Review (ELR), Volume 11, Number 1 and accessible in the International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, Volume 5, Number 1 (January - March, 2010). Formatted and edited in Connexions by Theodore Creighton, Virginia Tech.

Introduction

The topic of leadership for social justice in schools has been generating quite a bit of scholarship over the last few years. Theoharis (2004a) conducted a meta-analysis of the literature and discovered several barriers to teaching and leading for social justice. Theoharis (2004b) studied principals who actively led for social justice and from that research offered a theory of social justice leadership. In two edited texts, Marshall and Oliva (2006, 2009) have offered various perspectives on leadership for social justice. Dantley and Tillman (2007) give a comprehensive review of the praxis of social justice leadership in three main areas: research and scholarship, conference presentations, and teaching. Since the authors are advocates for social justice in schools, they indicated that the work must begin with the educational leaders.

Furman and Shields (2003) wrote that social justice had recently acquired a new emphasis and importance for education. The growing diversity of school populations, the increasing achievement and economic gaps, and the injustices that may be caused by current, high-stakes assessment and accountability policies are several reasons for the field of educational leadership to focus on leadership for social justice. While much of the literature related to social justice and democratic community has developed in the areas of curriculum theory and cultural studies, these themes are increasing in the field of educational leadership (Furman&Shields, 2003). The dimensions of leadership that they describe focus on key areas in schools – ethics, context, process, transformation, and pedagogy.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Education leadership review, volume 11, number 1; march 2010. OpenStax CNX. Feb 02, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11179/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Education leadership review, volume 11, number 1; march 2010' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask