<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
I.J. Good's introduction to the collection of essays, The Good Book: Thirty Years of Comments, Conjectures and Conclusions by I.J. Good, edited by David Banks and Eric P. Smith. The book is available in print from Rice University Press (http://ricepress.rice.edu).

(This module helps introduce The Good Book: Thirty Years of Comments, Conjectures and Conclusions, by I.J. Good . The book is available for purchase from the Rice University Press Store . You can also visit the Rice University Press web site .)

I greatly welcomed David Banks's proposal for him to edit a book of my CCCs (Comments, Conjectures and Conclusions; a few writtenjointly with other authors), which appeared in my column in JSCS ( Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation ). David Banks has invited me to write an introduction and to explain also how this column originated. I'll do the latter first.

Ever since my youth, I have believed that Brevity is the Soul of Wit,

Quoted from Polonius (Lord Chamberlain) In Hamlet , Act I, Science II.
as exemplified in The Scientist Speculates, An Anthology of Partly BakedIdeas
German translation, Phantasie in der Wissenschaft: eine Anthologie unausgegorener Ideen (Econ Verlag,1965). French translation Quand les Savants laissent libre Cours ˆ leur Imagination (Dunod, Paris, 1967). The French version omits thechapter on the paranormal.
(the Preface was the brevity: “The intention of this anthology is to raise more questions than itanswers”) and in the twenty-eight columns of pbis (partially baked ideas) in the Mensa Bulletin and Journal . These were assembled in a Technical Report.
The Technical Report appeared as # 2166 in my complete publication list.
After discussion with Richard G. Krutchkoff, the editor of JSCS , he invited me to edit columns of CCCs. They began in 1977 and contained many items byother authors which are not represented in the present book.

I greatly liked also the three extremely well-written and kind appreciations of my work by Stephen Fienberg, Nozer Singpurwalla,and James R. Thompson&David W. Scott, which they had prepared largely for my ninetieth birthday party. Those appreciations andthis introduction are not especially related to my brevities. The brevities in this book speak for themselves, and the brevity of this introductionis therefore appropriate.

Because I was once regarded as a statistical dissident, let me discuss establishment and dissident views in general.

Thomas Kuhn, who is well known by philosophers of science, defined a period of normal science as one in which a specific paradigm is usually adopted. Call it the Establishment view and assume there is one for each named science. But there are dissidents whoare at first ignored by the Establishment, but who eventually form a new Establishment and another “normal” period. This process isn'trestricted to scientific topics; compare the one-volume (abridged) edition (1932) of The Golden Bough by J.G. Frazer (originally published in twelve volumes in 1922). Frazer mentions variousplaces, especially in parts of Africa, where priests and kings were killed after a fixed period or after a public calamity such as adrought. Or consider the sixteenth-century aphorism by John Harington, “ Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason .” Paradigm changes can be regarded as revolutions , but they are not necessarily sudden and there can be a period in which there are two or moreparadigms. For example, there is a mixture of the caloric theory and its explanation, Statistical Mechanics; and a mixture betweenprerelativity and relativity. (It is said that von Newman told a policeman that a house had struck von Newman's car, thus wittilyapplying the principle of relativity to an inappropriate situation.) In Statistics we have a mixture of frequentism and Bayesianism . Frequentism is based on the use of P-values for the acceptance and refutation of hypotheses where refutation can be called inexactification as I expressed it in a lecture at Berkeley some years ago. Bayesianism in its turn canbe objective (impersonal) or subjective (personal). These depend respectively on impersonal and personal probabilities.(One application of impersonal probabilities is to the metaphysical problem of why there should be something rather than nothing.Nothingness is simpler than somethingness.) Sometimes it is convenient to use one methodology and sometimes another. Iexperienced this phenomenon during World War II, when working as a cryptanalyst in Bletchley Park. (See, for example, my chapter“Enigma and Fish” in Codebreakers: The Inside Story of Bletchley Park , edited by F.H. Hinsley and Allan Stripp, Oxford University Press, 1994. Or see my work in the book edited byCopeland mentioned in Note 4.) To give an example: in one procedure of many ( setting wheels 1 and 2 of a German enciphering machine SZ42, which we called Fish or Tunny), there were 31 × 41 = 1271 hypotheses, each with prior probability 1 / 1271 . But if a score of a setting, after a Colossus

Colossus was a large electronic cryptanalytic machine built in England duringWWII. Its purpose was to enable the regular breaking of the SZ42enciphered messages. It was close to being general purpose and was thus of much historical significance, apart from its enormous valuefor the defeat of Hitler. See, for example, Colossus: the Secrets of Bletchley Park's Codebreaking Computers , edited by B. Jack Copeland (Oxford University Press, 2006). I showed after thewar that Colossus could be used for another purpose. (See page 327 of the book.) Colossus should not be confused with the Bombe, whichwas very large, but very different, being a special-purpose electromagnetic cryptanalytic machine used against the Enigma. Later,there was an American electronic form of the Bombe designed by Joseph Desch.
run, was close to four standard deviations above the mean, then the posterior odds were not 30 (as we sometimes inferredincorrectly from a P-value of 1 / 30 , 000 ) but only about 1 ( evens ) from a Bayesian point of view. But we would also refer to the sigma-age or sigmage of a bulge above the mean.

In a discussion at the Second Valencia meeting on Statistics in 1983, Lindley predicted that the 21stcentury would be Bayesian, and I predicted it would be a century of the Bayes/non-Bayes compromise .

“The Bayes/non-Bayes compromise: a brief revue,” JASA 87 (Sept. 1992), 597-606. A Presidential Invited Paper, Atlanta, Georgia, August 20, 1991.
Mixture might be a better term than compromise . There are children now who will judge, at the end of the century, who wasmore correct. This statement is conditional on there being anyone alive at that time!

This book is about statistical brevity and about the views of one of the early dissidents. Some readers might wish to expand some itemsinto full-length dissertations.

For getting this book into suitable electronic form, I am most grateful to Eric P. Smith, the present head of the StatisticsDepartment at Virginia Tech, Linda Breeding, and Byron Smith.

I. J. Good, January 12, 2008

Questions & Answers

find the 15th term of the geometric sequince whose first is 18 and last term of 387
Jerwin Reply
I know this work
The given of f(x=x-2. then what is the value of this f(3) 5f(x+1)
virgelyn Reply
hmm well what is the answer
how do they get the third part x = (32)5/4
kinnecy Reply
can someone help me with some logarithmic and exponential equations.
Jeffrey Reply
sure. what is your question?
okay, so you have 6 raised to the power of 2. what is that part of your answer
I don't understand what the A with approx sign and the boxed x mean
it think it's written 20/(X-6)^2 so it's 20 divided by X-6 squared
I'm not sure why it wrote it the other way
I got X =-6
ok. so take the square root of both sides, now you have plus or minus the square root of 20= x-6
oops. ignore that.
so you not have an equal sign anywhere in the original equation?
is it a question of log
I rally confuse this number And equations too I need exactly help
But this is not salma it's Faiza live in lousvile Ky I garbage this so I am going collage with JCTC that the of the collage thank you my friends
Commplementary angles
Idrissa Reply
im all ears I need to learn
right! what he said ⤴⤴⤴
what is a good calculator for all algebra; would a Casio fx 260 work with all algebra equations? please name the cheapest, thanks.
Kevin Reply
a perfect square v²+2v+_
Dearan Reply
kkk nice
Abdirahman Reply
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
Kim Reply
or infinite solutions?
The answer is neither. The function, 2 = 0 cannot exist. Hence, the function is undefined.
Embra Reply
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
Nancy Reply
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
ramon Reply
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Bridget Reply
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
Emedobi Reply
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
Mary Reply
how do you translate this in Algebraic Expressions
linda Reply
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
Crystal Reply
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
Chris Reply
what's the easiest and fastest way to the synthesize AgNP?
Damian Reply
types of nano material
abeetha Reply
I start with an easy one. carbon nanotubes woven into a long filament like a string
many many of nanotubes
what is the k.e before it land
what is the function of carbon nanotubes?
I'm interested in nanotube
what is nanomaterials​ and their applications of sensors.
Ramkumar Reply
what is nano technology
Sravani Reply
what is system testing?
preparation of nanomaterial
Victor Reply
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
Himanshu Reply
good afternoon madam
what is system testing
what is the application of nanotechnology?
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field . 1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc 2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc 3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc. and may other field for details you can check at Google
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change . maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
I'm interested in Nanotube
this technology will not going on for the long time , so I'm thinking about femtotechnology 10^-15
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
Prasenjit Reply
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
Ali Reply
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
bamidele Reply
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Smarajit Reply
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
QuizOver.com Reply

Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, Introductory material to the good book: thirty years of comments, conjectures and conclusions. OpenStax CNX. Sep 12, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10572/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Introductory material to the good book: thirty years of comments, conjectures and conclusions' conversation and receive update notifications?