# 6.12 Matching

 Page 1 / 1
Using the Smith Chart to match the appropriate circuit elements to a line.

This gets us to "B", and we find that $\frac{{Z}_{L}()}{{Z}_{0}()}=1+1.2i$ .Now this is a very interesting

result. Suppose we take the load off the line, and add, in series, an additional capacitor, whose reactance is $\frac{1}{j\times \omega \times C}=-(i\times 1.2{Z}_{0})$ .

The capacitor and the inductor just cancel each other out (series resonance) and so the apparent load for the line is just ${Z}_{0}()$ , the magnitude of the reflection coefficient (Γ)= 0 and the $\mathrm{VSWR}=1.0$ ! All of the energy flowing down the line is coupled to the load resistor, and nothing is reflected back towards the load.

We were lucky that the real part of $\frac{{Z}_{L}()}{{Z}_{0}()}=1$ . If there were not that case, we would not be able to "match" the load to the line, right? Not completely. Let'sconsider another example. The next figure shows a line with a ${Z}_{0}()=50$ , terminated with a $25(Ω)$ resistor. ${\Gamma }_{L}()=\frac{-1}{3}$ , and we end up with the VSWR circle shown in the subsequent figure .

How could we match this load? We could add another 25Ω in series with the first resistor, but if we want to maximize thepower we deliver to the first one, this would not be a very satisfactory approach. Let's move down the line a ways. If we goto point "B", we find that

at this spot, $\frac{{Z}_{s}()}{{Z}_{0}()}=1+0.8i$ . Once again we have an impedance with a normalized real part equals 1! How far do we go? It looks like it's a littlemore than $0.15(\lambda )$ . If we add a negative reactance in series with the line at this point, with a normalized value of $-(0.8i)$ , then from that point on back to the generator, the line would "look" like it was terminated with a matched load.

There's one awkward feature to this solution, and that is we have to cut the line to insert the capacitor. It would be a loteasier if we could simply add something across the line, instead of having to cut it. This is easily done, if we go over into theadmittance world.

a perfect square v²+2v+_
kkk nice
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
y=10×
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
is it 3×y ?
J, combine like terms 7x-4y
im not good at math so would this help me
how did I we'll learn this
f(x)= 2|x+5| find f(-6)
f(n)= 2n + 1
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
preparation of nanomaterial
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!