<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
The caught mean value theorem and L'Hopital's rule are included in this module, accompanied by practice exercises.

Many limits of certain combinations of functions are difficult to evaluate because they lead to what's known as“indeterminate forms.” These are expressions of the form 0 / 0 , / , 0 0 , - , 1 , and the like. They are precisely combinations of functions that are not covered by our limit theorems. See [link] . The very definition of the derivative itself is such a case: lim h 0 ( f ( c + h ) - f ( c ) ) = 0 , lim h 0 h = 0 , and we are interested in the limit of the quotient of these two functions, which would lead us to the indeterminate form 0 / 0 . The definition of the number e is another example: lim ( 1 + 1 / n ) = 1 , lim n = , and we are interested in the limit of ( 1 + 1 / n ) n , which leads to the indeterminate form 1 . L'Hopital's Rule, [link] below, is our strongest tool for handling such indeterminate forms.

To begin with, here is a useful generalization of the Mean Value Theorem.

Cauchy mean value theorem

Let f and g be continuous real-valued functions on a closed interval [ a , b ] , suppose g ( a ) g ( b ) , and assume that both f and g are differentiable on the open interval ( a , b ) . Then there exists a point c ( a , b ) such that

f ( b ) - f ( a ) g ( b ) - g ( a ) = f ' ( c ) g ' ( c ) .

Prove the preceding theorem.

HINT: Define an auxiliary function h as was done in the proof of the original Mean Value Theorem.

The following theorem and exercise comprise what is called L'Hopital's Rule.

Suppose f and g are differentiable real-valued functions on the bounded open interval ( a , b ) and assume that

lim x a + 0 f ' ( x ) g ' ( x ) = L ,

where L is a real number. (Implicit in this hypothesis is that g ' ( x ) 0 for x in some interval ( a , a + α ) . ) Suppose further that either

lim x a + 0 f ( x ) = lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = 0

or

lim x a + 0 f ( x ) = lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = .

then

lim x a + 0 f ( x ) g ( x ) = L .

Suppose first that

lim x a + 0 f ( x ) = lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = 0 .

Observe first that, because g ' ( x ) 0 for all x in some interval ( a , a + α ) , g ' ( x ) is either always positive or always negative on that interval. (This follows from part (d) of [link] .) Thereforethe function g must be strictly monotonic on the interval ( a , a + α ) . Hence, since lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = 0 , we must have that g ( x ) 0 on the interval ( a , a + α ) .

Now, given an ϵ > 0 , choose a positive δ < α such that if a < c < a + δ then | f ' ( c ) g ' ( c ) - L | < ϵ . Then, for every natural number n for which 1 / n < δ , and every a < x < a + δ , we have by the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem that there exists a point c between a + 1 / n and x such that

| f ( x ) - f ( a + 1 / n ) g ( x ) - g ( a + 1 / n ) - L | = | f ' ( c ) g ' ( c ) - L | < ϵ .

Therefore, taking the limit as n approaches , we obtain

| f ( x ) g ( x ) - L | = lim n | f ( x ) - f ( a + 1 / n ) g ( x ) - g ( a + 1 / n ) - L | ϵ

for all x for which a < x < a + δ . This proves the theorem in this first case.

Next, suppose that

lim x a + 0 f ( x ) = lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = .

This part of the theorem is a bit more complicated to prove. First, choose a positive α so that f ( x ) and g ( x ) are both positive on the interval ( a , a + α ) . This is possible because both functions are tending to infinity as x approaches a . Now, given an ϵ > 0 , choose a positive number β < α such that

| f ' ( c ) g ' ( c ) - L | < ϵ 2

for all a < c < a + β . We express this absolute value inequality as the following pair of ordinary inequalities:

L - ϵ 2 < f ' ( c ) g ' ( c ) < L + ϵ 2 .

Set y = a + β . Using the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem, and the preceding inequalities, we have that for all a < x < y

L - ϵ 2 < f ( x ) - f ( y ) g ( x ) - g ( y ) < L + ϵ 2 ,

implying that

( L - ϵ 2 ) ( g ( x ) - g ( y ) ) + f ( y ) < f ( x ) < ( L + ϵ 2 ) ( g ( x ) - g ( y ) ) + f ( y ) .

Dividing through by g ( x ) and simplifying we obtain

L - ϵ 2 - ( L - ϵ 2 ) g ( y ) g ( x ) + f ( y ) g ( x ) < f ( x ) g ( x ) < L + ϵ 2 - ( L + ϵ 2 ) g ( y ) g ( x ) + f ( y ) g ( x ) .

Finally, using the hypothesis that lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = , and the fact that L , ϵ , g ( y ) , and f ( y ) are all constants, choose a δ > 0 , with δ < β , such that if a < x < a + δ , then

| - ( L - ϵ 2 ) g ( y ) g ( x ) + f ( y ) g ( x ) | < ϵ 2

and

| - ( L + ϵ 2 ) g ( y ) g ( x ) + f ( y ) g ( x ) | < ϵ 2 .

Then, for all a < x < a + δ , we would have

L - ϵ < f ( x ) g ( x ) < L + ϵ ,

implying that

| f ( x ) g ( x ) - L | < ϵ ,

and the theorem is proved.

  1. Show that the conclusions of the preceding theorem also hold if we assume that
    lim x a + 0 f ' ( x ) g ' ( x ) = .
    HINT: Replace ϵ by a large real number B and show that f ( x ) / g ( x ) > B if 0 < x - a < δ .
  2. Show that the preceding theorem, as well as part (a) of this exercise, also holds if we replacethe (finite) endpoint a by - . HINT: Replace the δ 's by negative numbers B .
  3. Show that the preceding theorem, as well as parts a and b of this exercise, hold if the limit as x approaches a from the right is replaced by the limit as x approaches b from the left. HINT: Replace f ( x ) by f ( - x ) and g ( x ) by g ( - x ) .
  4. Give an example to show that the converse of L'Hopital's Rule need not hold; i.e., find functions f and g for which lim x a + 0 f ( x ) = lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = 0 ,
    lim x a + 0 f ( x ) g ( x ) exists, but lim x a + 0 f ' ( x ) g ' ( x ) does not exist.
  5. Deduce from the proof given above that if lim x a + 0 f ' ( x ) / g ' ( x ) = L and lim x a + 0 g ( x ) = , then lim x a + 0 f ( x ) / g ( x ) = L independent of the behavior of f .
  6. Evaluate lim x x 1 / x , and lim x 0 ( 1 - x ) 1 / x . HINT: Take logarithms.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask