# 3.9 Normal, tension, and other examples of forces  (Page 2/10)

 Page 2 / 10

## Weight on an incline, a two-dimensional problem

Consider the skier on a slope shown in [link] . Her mass including equipment is 60.0 kg. (a) What is her acceleration if friction is negligible? (b) What is her acceleration if friction is known to be 45.0 N?

Strategy

This is a two-dimensional problem, since the forces on the skier (the system of interest) are not parallel. The approach we have used in two-dimensional kinematics also works very well here. Choose a convenient coordinate system and project the vectors onto its axes, creating two connected one -dimensional problems to solve. The most convenient coordinate system for motion on an incline is one that has one coordinate parallel to the slope and one perpendicular to the slope. (Remember that motions along mutually perpendicular axes are independent.) We use the symbols $\perp$ and $\parallel$ to represent perpendicular and parallel, respectively. This choice of axes simplifies this type of problem, because there is no motion perpendicular to the slope and because friction is always parallel to the surface between two objects. The only external forces acting on the system are the skier’s weight, friction, and the support of the slope, respectively labeled $\mathbf{\text{w}}$ , $\mathbf{\text{f}}$ , and $\mathbf{\text{N}}$ in [link] . $\mathbf{\text{N}}$ is always perpendicular to the slope, and $\mathbf{\text{f}}$ is parallel to it. But $\mathbf{\text{w}}$ is not in the direction of either axis, and so the first step we take is to project it into components along the chosen axes, defining ${w}_{\parallel }$ to be the component of weight parallel to the slope and ${w}_{\perp }$ the component of weight perpendicular to the slope. Once this is done, we can consider the two separate problems of forces parallel to the slope and forces perpendicular to the slope.

Solution

The magnitude of the component of the weight parallel to the slope is ${w}_{\parallel }=\mathit{w}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)=\mathit{mg}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)$ , and the magnitude of the component of the weight perpendicular to the slope is ${w}_{\perp }=\mathit{w}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)=\mathit{mg}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)$ .

(a) Neglecting friction. Since the acceleration is parallel to the slope, we need only consider forces parallel to the slope. (Forces perpendicular to the slope add to zero, since there is no acceleration in that direction.) The forces parallel to the slope are the amount of the skier’s weight parallel to the slope ${w}_{\parallel }$ and friction $f$ . Using Newton’s second law, with subscripts to denote quantities parallel to the slope,

${a}_{\parallel }=\frac{{F}_{\text{net}\parallel }}{m}$

where ${F}_{\text{net}\parallel }={w}_{\parallel }=\text{mg}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)$ , assuming no friction for this part, so that

${a}_{\parallel }=\frac{{F}_{\text{net}\parallel }}{m}=\frac{\text{mg}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)}{m}=g\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left(\text{25º}\right)$
$\left(9.80\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}{\text{m/s}}^{2}\right)\left(0.4226\right)=4.14\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}{\text{m/s}}^{2}$

is the acceleration.

(b) Including friction. We now have a given value for friction, and we know its direction is parallel to the slope and it opposes motion between surfaces in contact. So the net external force is now

a perfect square v²+2v+_
kkk nice
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
or infinite solutions?
Kim
y=10×
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
is it 3×y ?
J, combine like terms 7x-4y
im not good at math so would this help me
how did I we'll learn this
f(x)= 2|x+5| find f(-6)
f(n)= 2n + 1
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
preparation of nanomaterial
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it