<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Insert paragraph text here.

  • Andrade MB. 1996. Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271: 70-72.
  • Andrade MB. 1998. Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behavior  despite male sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol. 9: 33-42.         
  • Andrade MB. 2003. Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol. 14: 531-538.
  • Andrade MB, Snow LS.  2005.  Multiple sperm storage organs facilitate female control of paternity.  Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.  270: 1623-1629.
  • Araqvist G, Henriksson S. 1997. Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol. 11:253-271.
  • Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME.  2008. Female praying mantids use sexual
  • cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity. Behav Ecol. 19: 710-715.
  • Bilde T, Tuni C, Elsayed R, Pekar S, Toft S. 2006. Death feigning in the face of sexual cannibalism. Biol Lett. 2: 23-25.
  • Birkhead TR, Lee KE, Young P.  1988. Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis Hierodula membrnacea . Behavior 106: 112-118.
  • Blanckenhorn WU. 2000.  The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms so small? Quart Rev Biol 75: 385-407.
  • Bonduriansky R.  2001.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.  Biol Rev. 76: 305-339.
  • Bukowski RC, Linn CD, Christenson TE.  2001.  Copulation and sperm release in Gasteracantha cancriformis (Araneae : Araneidae) differential male behaviour based on female mating history.  Anim Behav. 62: 887-895.
  • Buskirk RE, Frohlich C, Ross KG. The natural selection of sexual cannibalism. Am Nat. 1984. 123:612-625.
  • Chapman T, Partridge L.  1996.  Sexual Conflict as Fuel for Evolution.  Nature 381: 189- 190. 
  • Choe JC. 1995. Courtship feeding and repeated mating in Zorotypus barberi (Insecta: Zoraptera). Anim Behav. 49: 1511-1520.
  • Eberhard WG.  2000.  Criteria for demonstrating postcopulatory female choice.  Ev. 54: 1047-1050.
  • Eberhard WG.  2004.  Why study spider sex?  Special traits of spiders facilitate studies of sperm competition and cryptic female choice.  J. Arachnol. 32: 545-556.
  • Eisenberg RM, Hurd LE, Bartley JA. 1981. Ecological consequences of food limitation for adult mantids ( Tenodera ardifolia sinensis Saussure ). Am Mid Nat. 106: 209- 218.
  • Elgar MA. 1991.  Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates.  Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa .  Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128-155.
  • Elgar MA,  Bathgate R. 1996.  Female receptivity and male mate-guarding in the jewel spider, Gasteracantha minax .  Journal Insec Behav. 9: 729-738.
  • Elgar MA, Nash DR. 1988. Sexual cannibalism in the garden spider Araneus diadematus . Anim Behav. 36: 1511-1517.
  • Elgar MA, Schneider JM, Herberstein ME. 2000. Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi . R Soc Lond. 267: 2439-2443.
  • Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ.  2003.  Spontaneous male death during copulation of an orb- weaving spider.  The Roy Soc. 270: 183-185.
  • Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ.  2004.  Males under attack: sexual cannibalism and its consequences for male morphology and behavior in an orb-weaving spider.  Evol Ecol Res. 6: 163-181.
  • Forster LM.  1992.  The stereotyped behavior of sexual cannibalism in Latrodectus hasselti (Araneae: Theridiiidae), the Australian redback spider.  Aus Jour Zool. 40: 1-11.
  • Fox LR. 1975a. Cannibalism in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 6: 87-106.
  • Fox LR. 1975b. Factors influencing cannibalism, a mechanism of population limitation in the predator Notonecta hoffmanni .  Ecology. 56: 933-941.
  • Gemeno C, Claramunt J. 2006. Sexual approach in the praying mantid mantis religiosa . J Insect Behav. 19: 731-740.
  • Gould, SJ. 1997. The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype. Natl Acad Sci. 94: 10750-10755.
  • Haddon M. 1995.  Avoidance of post-cloital cannibalism in the brachyurid paddle crab Ovalipes catharus .  Oecologia 104: 256-258.
  • Hebets EA. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype.  Nat Academ of Sci.   100: 13390-13395.
  • Hebets EA, Wesson J, Shamble PS. 2008. Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders. Anim Behav. 76: 355-363.
  • Hellriegel B, Ward PI. 1998.  Complex female reproductive tract morphology: its possible use in postcopulatory female choice.  J. Theor. Biol. 190: 179-186.
  • Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Kramer DL.  2003. The role of energy availability in mammalian hibernation: a cost-benefit approach. Phys and Bioch Zool. 76: 165-179.
  • Hurd LE, Eisenberg RM, Fagan WF. 1994. Cannibalism revereses male-biased sex ratio in adult mantids: female strategy against food limitation? Oikos. 69:193-198.
  • Lang A.  1996.  Silk investments in gifts by males of the nuptial feeding spider Pisaura mirabilis (Araneae: Pisauridae).  Behav. 133: 697-716.
  • Lelito JP, Brown WD. 2006. Complicity or conflict over sexual cannibalism?  Male risk taking in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis . Am Nat. 168: 263-269.
  • Liske E. 1991. Sensorimotor control of abdominal mating movements in the male praying mantis. Zool J Physiol. 95: 465-473.
  • Liske E, Davis WJ. 1984. Sexual behavior of the Chinese praying mantis. Anim Behav. 32: 916-918
  • Liske E, Davis WJ. 1987. Courtship and mating behavior of the Chinese praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia sinensis . Anim Behav. 35: 1524-1537.
  • Megina C, Cervera JL.  2002. Diet, prey selection a nd cannibalism in the hunter opisthobranch Roboastra europaea .  Jour Marin Biol Assoc UK 83: 489-495.
  • Morse DH. 2004.  A test of sexual cannibalism models, using a sit-and-wait predator. Biol J Linn Soc. 81:427-437.
  • Newman JA, Elgar MA. 1991. Sexual cannibalism in orb-weaving spiders: an economic model. Am Nat. 138: 1372-1395.
  • Persons MH, Uetz GW. 2003. Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characteristics. Anim Behav. 69:83-94.
  • Prenter J, MacNeil C, Elwood RW. 2006. Sexual cannibalism and mate choice. Anim Behav. 71: 481-490.
  • Rabaneda-Bueno R et al.  2008.  Sexual cannibalism: high incidence in a natural population with benefits to females. PlosOne. 3:1-10.
  • Robinson MH, Robinson B.  1979. By dawn’s early light: matutinal mating and sex attractants in a neotropical mantid.  Science 204: 825-827.
  • Rubenstein DI 1987.  Alternative reproductive tactics in the spider Meta segmentata . Behav Ecol and Sociol. 20: 229-237.
  • Siller S.  2001.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex.  Nature 411: 689-692.
  • Sasaki T, Iwahashi O.  1995.  Sexual cannibalism in an orb-weaving spider Argiope aemula .  Anim Behav.  49: 1119-1121.
  • Schneider JM, Elgar MA. 2001. Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition on the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav Ecol.12: 547-552.
  • Schneider JM, Fromhage L. 2005. Safe sex with feeding females: sexual conflict in a cannibalistic spider. Behav Ecol. 16: 377-382.
  • Shneider JM, Lubin Y. 1998. Intersexual conflict in spiders. Oikos 83: 496-506.
  • Schneider JM, Fromhage L, Uhl G. 2003. Fitness consequences of sexual cannibalism in female Argiope bruennichi . Behav Ecol and Sociob. 55: 60-64.
  • Schneider JM, Gilberg S, Fromhage L, Uhl G. 2006. Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Anim Behav. 71:781-788.
  • Stalhandske P. 2001. Nuptial gift in the spider Pisaura mirabilis maintained by sexual selection.  Behav Ecol. 12: 691-697.
  • Thornhill R. 1976a.  Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects.  Am Nat. 110: 153-163.
  • Thornhill R.  1976b. Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis . Am Nat.110: 529-548. 
  • Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider J.  2007. Copulatory mechanism in a sexually cannibalistic spider with genital mutilation (Araneae: Araneidae: Argiope bruennichi). Zool. 100: 398-408.
  • Vollrath F, Parker GA.  1992.  Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature 360: 156-159.
  • Wilder SM, Rypstra AL. 2008a. Diet quality affects mating behavior and egg production in a wolf spider. Anim Behav. 76: 439-445.
  • Wilder SM, Rypstra AL. 2008b. Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders. Am Nat. 172: 431-440.
  • Yagar DD, Svenson GJ.  2008.  Patterns of praying mantis auditory system evolution based on morphological, molecular, neurophysiological, and behavioral data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 541-568.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior. OpenStax CNX. Jan 12, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11211/1.5
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask