<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

To quantify the growth of the field of art history over time, data were collected on the number of Ph.D.’s awarded over the past 25 years in several disciplinary areasrelated to art history. These data were obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics, which collects annual data ondegree completions from institutions of higher education at the level of specific instructional programs. The followingdisciplinary categories were combined to develop a measure for the number of Ph.D.’s awarded in the field of“art history”(for more information about the Classification of Instructional Programs/CIPtaxonomy used by NCES and the methods used to compile these data, please see Appendix B):

  • Art History, Criticism and Conservation (CIP code 50.0703)
  • Fine Arts and Arts Studies, General (CIP code 50.0701)
  • Fine Arts and Arts Studies, Other (CIP code 50.0799)
  • Film/Cinema Studies (CIP code 50.0601)
  • Historic Preservation and Conservation (CIP code 30.1201)
  • Historic Preservation and Conservation, Other (CIP code 30.1209)
  • Medieval and Renaissance Studies (CIP code 30.1301)
  • Museology/Museum Studies (CIP code 30.1401)

It should be noted that Ph.D.’s awarded in areas such as Architecture and Archaeology were not included inthese analyses.

Program-level data on Ph.D.’s conferred are available going back to the 1979-80 academic year. In 1979-80, thefield of art history (as defined by the instructional program categories listed above) awarded doctoral degrees to 154 students.As late as the 1992-93 academic year, when 159 Ph.D.’s were awarded in art history, the number of doctoral degrees awarded in the fieldremained at about this level. On average, the field awarded about 156 Ph.D.’s per year over this 14-year period (1979-1993).

(Click on graphic for enlarged view.)

In 1993-94, the number of Ph.D.’s awarded in art history jumped to 193. The following year, 205 Ph.D.’s were conferred. For the four-year period beginning in 1993-94, the fieldawarded an average of 198 Ph.D.’s per year, an increase of 27% over the previous 14-year average. The next five-year period (1997-98 to2001-02) saw another jump in the average number of Ph.D.’s awarded annually in the field, up to 225, an increase of 14% over theprevious four-year average.

The most recent two years for which data are available (2002-03 and 2003-04) show that the number of Ph.D.’s awarded in the field has risen yet again, to 260 in’02-’03 and 259 in’03-’04. This represents an increase of 104 Ph.D.’s per year over the rate that prevailed in the field just eleven years earlier(156). That’s a 66% increase since the early 1990s.

Is this rate of increase reflective of general trends in higher education? As it turns out, the answer is no. Theoverall number of Ph.D.’s awarded across all fields has risen by about 1 percent per year since 1992-93. But the number of arthistory-related Ph.D.’s has risen by about 8 percent per year over that same period of time.

(Click on graphic for enlarged view.)

This most recent increase in the number of Ph.D.’s awarded in the field comes at a time when the number of art history-related titles being published by university presses hasleveled off and the number of single-author works being published has begun to decline. Year by year, the number of art historytitles published by university presses between 2000 and 2004 has tracked as follows: 404, 412, 388, 355, and 390. Meanwhile, thenumber of Ph.D.’s awarded in art history over the same period of time (1999-2000 through 2003-04) was: 225, 221, 213, 260, and259.

It may be instructive to look at the relationship between the number of art history titles published byuniversity presses and the number of Ph.D.’s awarded by the field on a year-by-year basis over time. A simple way to do this is tocompute an annual ratio between the two numbers, such as by dividing the number of art history titles published in a given yearby the number of Ph.D.’s conferred during the academic year ending in that same calendar year. For example, in 1989, there were 239art history titles published by university presses. During the 1988-89 academic year, there were 161 art history Ph.D.’s awarded. Dividing the former by the latter produces a ratio of about 1.4 arthistory titles published per Ph.D. awarded in the field.

Carrying these calculations out for other years shows that during the 1990s, when the annual number of arthistory titles published was growing at a respectable pace (95% more titles were published during the late 1990s than during thelate 1980s), this ratio rose to about 1.8 art history titles published per Ph.D. awarded. In other words, relative to the rateat which the number of Ph.D.’s awarded increased during the 1990s, the rate of art history titles being published increased faster. Asof the latest year for which we have both publishing and Ph.D. data (2004), however, this ratio has now gone back down to 1.4, where itwas in 1989.

So, is there a“crisis”in art history publishing at the present time, or was the period of the 1990s atime of“irrational exuberance”in terms of the publication of art history titles? Whatever the case may be, it is clear that therelationship between the production of art history titles and art history Ph.D.’s has changed dramatically during the past five years, and that both publishers and art history scholars facesignificant challenges in coming to grips with these changes.

Questions & Answers

find the 15th term of the geometric sequince whose first is 18 and last term of 387
Jerwin Reply
The given of f(x=x-2. then what is the value of this f(3) 5f(x+1)
virgelyn Reply
hmm well what is the answer
how do they get the third part x = (32)5/4
kinnecy Reply
can someone help me with some logarithmic and exponential equations.
Jeffrey Reply
sure. what is your question?
okay, so you have 6 raised to the power of 2. what is that part of your answer
I don't understand what the A with approx sign and the boxed x mean
it think it's written 20/(X-6)^2 so it's 20 divided by X-6 squared
I'm not sure why it wrote it the other way
I got X =-6
ok. so take the square root of both sides, now you have plus or minus the square root of 20= x-6
oops. ignore that.
so you not have an equal sign anywhere in the original equation?
is it a question of log
Commplementary angles
Idrissa Reply
im all ears I need to learn
right! what he said ⤴⤴⤴
what is a good calculator for all algebra; would a Casio fx 260 work with all algebra equations? please name the cheapest, thanks.
Kevin Reply
a perfect square v²+2v+_
Dearan Reply
kkk nice
Abdirahman Reply
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
Kim Reply
or infinite solutions?
The answer is neither. The function, 2 = 0 cannot exist. Hence, the function is undefined.
Embra Reply
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
Nancy Reply
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
ramon Reply
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Bridget Reply
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
Emedobi Reply
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
Mary Reply
how do you translate this in Algebraic Expressions
linda Reply
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
Crystal Reply
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
Chris Reply
what's the easiest and fastest way to the synthesize AgNP?
Damian Reply
types of nano material
abeetha Reply
I start with an easy one. carbon nanotubes woven into a long filament like a string
many many of nanotubes
what is the k.e before it land
what is the function of carbon nanotubes?
I'm interested in nanotube
what is nanomaterials​ and their applications of sensors.
Ramkumar Reply
what is nano technology
Sravani Reply
what is system testing?
preparation of nanomaterial
Victor Reply
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
Himanshu Reply
good afternoon madam
what is system testing
what is the application of nanotechnology?
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field . 1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc 2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc 3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc. and may other field for details you can check at Google
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change . maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
I'm interested in Nanotube
this technology will not going on for the long time , so I'm thinking about femtotechnology 10^-15
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
Prasenjit Reply
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
Ali Reply
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
bamidele Reply
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Smarajit Reply
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
QuizOver.com Reply

Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, The state of scholarly publishing in the history of art and architecture. OpenStax CNX. Sep 22, 2006 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10377/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'The state of scholarly publishing in the history of art and architecture' conversation and receive update notifications?