<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
  1. Let S be the set of all real numbers x for which x < 1 . Give an example of an upper bound for S . What is the least upper bound of S ? Is sup S an element of S ?
  2. Let S be the set of all x R for which x 2 4 . Give an example of an upper bound for S . What is the least upper bound of S ? Does sup S belong to S ?

We show now that R contains elements other than the rational numbers in Q . Of course this holds for any complete ordered field. The next theorem makes this quite explicit.

If x is a positive real number, then there exists a positive real number y such that y 2 = x . That is, every positive real number x has a positive square root in R . Moreover, there is only one positive square root of x .

Let S be the set of positive real numbers t for which t 2 x . Then S is nonempty Indeed, If x > 1 , then 1 is in S because 1 2 = 1 × 1 < 1 × x = x . And, if x 1 , then x itself is in S , because x 2 = x × x 1 × x = x .

Also, S is bounded above. In fact, the number 1 + x / 2 is an upper bound of S . Indeed, arguing by contradiction, suppose there were a t in S such that t > 1 + x / 2 . Then

x t 2 > ( 1 + x / 2 ) 2 = 1 + x + x 2 / 4 > x ,

which is a contradiction. Therefore, 1 + x / 2 is an upper bound of S , and so S is bounded above.

Now let y = sup S . We wish to show that y 2 = x . We show first that y 2 x , and then we will show that y 2 x . It will then follow from the tricotomy law that y 2 = x . We prove both these inequalities by contradiction.

So, assume first that y 2 > x , and write α for the positive number y 2 - x . Let ϵ be the positive number α / ( 2 y ) , and, using Theorem 1.5, choose a t S such that t > y - ϵ . Then y + t ( 2 y ) , and y - t < ϵ = α / 2 y . So,

α = y 2 - x = y 2 - t 2 + t 2 - x y 2 - t 2 = ( y + t ) ( y - t ) 2 y ( y - t ) < 2 y ϵ < 2 y × α 2 y = α ,

which is a contradiction. Therefore y 2 is not greater than x .

Now we show that y 2 is not less than x . Again, arguing by contradiction, suppose it is,and let ϵ be the positive number x - y 2 . Choose a positive number δ that is less than y and also less than ϵ / ( 3 y ) . Let s = y + δ . Then s is not in S , whence s 2 > x , so that we must have

ϵ = x - y 2 = x - s 2 + s 2 - y 2 s 2 - y 2 = ( s + y ) ( s - y ) = ( 2 y + δ ) δ < 3 y δ < ϵ ,

which again is a contradiction.

This completes the proof that y 2 = x ; i.e., that x has a positive square root.

Finally, if y ' were another positive number for which y ' 2 = x , we show that y = y ' by ruling out the other two cases: y < y ' and y > y ' . For instance, if y < y ' , then we would have that y 2 < y ' 2 , giving that

x = y 2 < y ' 2 = x ,

implying that x < x , and this is a contradiction.

If x is a positive real number, then the symbol x will denote the unique positive number y for which y 2 = x . Of course, 0 denotes the number 0.

REMARK Part (c) of [link] shows that the field Q contains no number whose square is 2, and [link] shows that the field R does contain a number whose square is 2. We have therefore “proved” that the real numbers is a largerset than the rational numbers. It may come as a surprise to learn that we only now have beenable to prove that. Look back through the chapter to be sure. It follows also that Q itself is not a complete ordered field. If it were, it would be isomorphic to R , by Theorem 1.2, so that it would have to contain a square root of 2, which it does not.

A real number x that is not a rational number, i.e., is not an element of the subset Q of R , is called an irrational number.

  1. Prove that every positive real number has exactly 2 square roots, one positive ( x ) and the other negative ( - x ).
  2. Prove that if x is a negative real number, then there is no real number y such that y 2 = x .
  3. Prove that the product of a nonzero rational number and an arbitrary irrationalnumber must be irrational. Show by example that the sum and product of irrational numbers can be rational.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask