<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Upon his arrival in Khartoum in January of 1884, General Gordon took upon himself the additional duty of attempting to establish a stable government inSudan rather than simply rounding up the evacuees and departing, apparently counter to his military orders. Unable to establish a such stability or to convince theMahdi to accept a position of administrative power, General Gordon was faced with the choice of defending his position at Khartoum or surrendering the city entirelyto the Mahdi. Gordon chose to fight it out. The Mahdists began the siege on Khartoum in early March of 1884; it ended in January of 1885.

As the siege continued through the spring, Gordon regularly notified his Government of his situation and his needs. Gordon wrote that with a few thousandtroops the Mahdi could be easily crushed, but no troops were sent. The General maintained his defensive position at Khartoum through the summer and fall, receivingsupplies by steam ships sent down the Nile fro Egypt. It is believed that public opinion in Sudan began to sway toward sympathy with the Mahdi over the many monthsof the siege. Gordon repeatedly wrote that he feared the treason of those he had been protecting from the Mahdi as much as the man himself. In the end it was fromthe inside that the gates of the city were opened to the Mahdi in January of 1885, only a few days before the long-awaited arrival of the regiment of relief finallysent by the British Government to save Gordon. The British troops were greeted atthe gates of Khartoum by the declaration of the Mahdi's victory: the head of their General hoisted upon a pike at the city's gates. Some in Britain viewed Gordon as amarty; others contended that he disobeyed superiors and brought his fate on himself in the vain quest for glory.

Introduction

It is never possible to know everything about any historical event, no matter how extensive your research. However, it is possible to develop a balanced perspective on those events if we are thorough in gathering our information and usea variety of reliable sources. In this module we will attempt to recreate the story represented in the "Egyptian Red Book," that of General Gordon and his trials in theSudan. We will demonstrate how to use different types of resources available at the typical academic library (as an example, we will use Rice University's FondrenLibrary). We will examine primary source materials--original documents such as letters, government reports, newspaper articles, books, videos, recordings and othersources that reveal how observers viewed an event. We will also look at secondary sources, accounts by people who were not first-hand witnesses to events, but whichdescribe and analyze events based on primary source materials and other secondary works. By analyzing a range of sources, we hope to gain a perspective on thepolitical views represented by our work and how they relate to the actual historical events they represent, and to come to a more complete, objective understanding ofthe events depicted in the "Red Book." We will use the following process:

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Studying political satire: "the egyptian red book". OpenStax CNX. Sep 19, 2006 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10290/1.6
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Studying political satire: "the egyptian red book"' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask