<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

This is depicted in Fig. 5 in what is called a “molecular orbital energy diagram.” Each pair of atomic orbitals, one from each atom, is overlapped to form a bonding and an anti-bonding orbital. The three 2p orbitals from each atom form one σ size 12{σ} {} and σ * size 12{σ rSup { size 8{1} } } {} pair and two π size 12{π} {} and π * size 12{σ rSup { size 8{1} } } {} pairs. The lowering of the energies of the electrons in the σ size 12{σ} {} and π size 12{π} {} orbitals is apparent. The ten n=2 electrons from the nitrogen atoms are then placed pairwise, in order of increasing energy, into these molecular orbitals. Note that, in agreement with the Pauli Exclusion Principle, each pair in a single orbital consists of one spin up and one spin down electron.

Recall now that we began the discussion of bonding in N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} because of the curious result that the ionization energy of an electron in F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is less than that of an electron in an F atom. By comparing the molecular orbital energy level diagrams for N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} and F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} we are now prepared to answer this puzzle. There are five p electrons in each fluorine atom. These ten electrons must be distributed over the molecular orbitals whose energies are shown in Fig. 6. (Note that the ordering of the bonding 2p orbitals differ between N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} and F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} .) We place two electrons in the σ size 12{σ} {} orbital, four more in the two π size 12{π rSup { size 8{ * } } } {} orbitals, and four more in the two π * size 12{σ rSup { size 8{1} } } {} orbitals. Overall, there are six electrons in bonding orbitals and four in anti-bonding orbitals. Since F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is a stable molecule, we must conclude that the lowering of energy for the electrons in the bonding orbitals is greater than the raising of energy for the electrons in the antibonding orbitals. Overall, this distribution of electrons is, net, equivalent to having two electrons paired in a single bonding orbital.

This also explains why the ionization energy of F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is less than that of an F atom. The electron with the highest energy requires the least energy to remove from the molecule or atom. The molecular orbital energy diagram in Fig. 6 clearly shows that the highest energy electrons in F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} are in anti-bonding orbitals. Therefore, one of these electrons is easier to remove than an electron in an atomic 2p orbital, because the energy of an anti-bonding orbital is higher than that of the atomic orbitals. (Recall that this is why an anti-bonding orbital is, indeed, anti-bonding.) Therefore, the ionization energy of molecular fluorine is less than that of atomic fluorine. This clearly demonstrates the physical reality and importance of the anti-bonding orbitals.

A particularly interesting case is the oxygen molecule, O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} . In completing the molecular orbital energy level diagram for oxygen, we discover that we must decide whether to pair the last two electrons in the same 2pπ * size 12{2pπ rSup { size 8{ * } } } {} orbital, or whether they should be separated into different 2pπ * size 12{2pπ rSup { size 8{ * } } } {} orbitals. To determine which, we note that oxygen molecules are paramagnetic, meaning that they are strongly attracted to a magnetic field. To account for this paramagnetism, we recall that electron spin is a magnetic property. In most molecules, all electrons are paired, so for each “spin up” electron there is a “spin down” electron and their magnetic fields cancel out. When all electrons are paired, the molecule is diamagnetic meaning that it responds only weakly to a magnetic field.

If the electrons are not paired, they can adopt the same spin in the presence of a magnetic field. This accounts for the attraction of the paramagnetic molecule to the magnetic field. Therefore, for a molecule to be paramagnetic, it must have unpaired electrons. The correct molecular orbital energy level diagram for an O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} molecule is shown in Fig. 7.

In comparing these three diatomic molecules, we recall that N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} has the strongest bond, followed by O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} and F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} . We have previously accounted for this comparison with Lewis structures, showing that N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is a triple bond, O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is a double bond, and F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is a single bond. The molecular orbital energy level diagrams in Figs. 5 to 7 cast a new light on this analysis. Note that, in each case, the number of bonding electrons in these molecules is eight. The difference in bonding is entirely due to the number of antibonding electrons: 2 for N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} , 4 for O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} , and six for F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} . Thus, the strength of a bond must be related to the relative numbers of bonding and antibonding electrons in the molecule. Therefore, we now define the bond order as

Bond Order = 1 2 # bonding electrons # antibonding electrons size 12{ ital "Bond"` ital "Order"= { {1} over {2} } left ( ital "bonding"` ital "electrons" - ital "antibonding"` ital "electrons" right )} {}

Note that, defined this way, the bond order for N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is 3, for O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is 2, and for F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is 1, which agrees with our conclusions from Lewis structures. We conclude that we can predict the relative strengths of bonds by comparing bond orders.

Review and discussion questions

  • Why does an electron shared by two nuclei have a lower potential energy than an electron on a single atom? Why does an electron shared by two nuclei have a lower kinetic energy than an electron on a single atom? How does this sharing result in a stable molecule? How can this affect be measured experimentally?
  • Explain why the bond in an H 2 size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } } {} molecule is almost twice as strong as the bond in the H 2 + size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {} ion. Explain why the H 2 size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } } {} bond is less than twice as strong as the H 2 + size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {} bond.
  • Be 2 size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is not a stable molecule. What information can we determine from this observation about the energies of molecular orbitals?
  • Less energy is required to remove an electron from an F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} molecule than to remove an electron from an F atom. Therefore, the energy of that electron is higher in the molecule than in the atom. Explain why, nevertheless, F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is a stable molecule, i.e., the energy of an F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} molecule is less than the energy of two F atoms.
  • Why do the orbitals of an atom "hybridize" when forming a bond?
  • Calculate the bond orders of the following molecules and predict which molecule in each pair has the stronger bond:
    • C 2 size 12{C rSub { size 8{2} } } {} or C 2 + size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {}
    • B 2 size 12{B rSub { size 8{2} } } {} or B 2 + size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {}
    • F 2 size 12{F rSub { size 8{2} } } {} or F 2 - size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {}
    • O 2 size 12{O rSub { size 8{2} } } {} or O 2 + size 12{H rSub { size 8{2} } rSup { size 8{+{}} } } {}
  • Which of the following diatomic molecules are paramagnetic: CO, Cl 2 size 12{ ital "Cl" rSub { size 8{2} } } {} , NO, N 2 size 12{N rSub { size 8{2} } } {} ?
  • B 2 size 12{B rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is observed to be paramagnetic. Using this information, draw an appropriate molecular orbital energy level diagram for B 2 size 12{B rSub { size 8{2} } } {} .

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, General chemistry i. OpenStax CNX. Jul 18, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10263/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'General chemistry i' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask