<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

When this cultural imperative interacts with China’s one-child per family policy, large gender imbalance result.

Before the spread of ultrasound technology in China, this meant a large number of female infanticides . After ultrasound became more accessible, sex-selective abortions rather than infanticide were common.

Nobel Laureate AK Sen once wrote an article “More than a Million Women are Missing”.

Amartya Sen (1990), “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing”, The New York Review of Books .

He was referring to infanticide or abortion of female fetuses.

Consider that in humans, nature provides a sex ratio of 950 girls for every 10000 boys at birth. This has arisen by natural selection, because of higher mortality rates for boy infants

Put another way, nature provides about 105 boys for every 100 girls.(The standard way of defining the concept).

Consider the Chinese, Indian and Korean experiences.

In China in 2010 among newborns, there were 118 boys for every 100 girls. One implication: as this age cohort grows up, there will not be enough brides for nearly 20% of today’s baby boys. Little imagination is required to assess social, economic and even military implications of this development.

The foregoing is a result of strong son preference; couple with easier availability of sonograms.

Social scientists used to say that son preference in poor countries would decline as per capita income rose above subsistence levels.

Is this happening? Not much in China. It is happening, maybe in some regions in India, but not in Northern India’s richer parts.

In China, richer regions such as Shanghai and Guangzhou have much higher rates of son preference then in poorer provinces i.e. they have a higher rate ratio of boys at birth than girls.

In India the picture is mixed. The census data for 2009, compared to that of 2001, shows a rising male-female sex ratio in four states. The variation in India still has not been satisfactorily explained. Source___ [Source?]

Source: “Gendercide in India”, the Economist, April 7, 2011
Table 7-1 India Selected States - State Ratio at Birth
Boys per 1000 Girls
2001 and 2008
Ratio 2008
Boys to Girls
Ratio 2001
Boys to Girls
Punjab 121 130
Delhi 114 120
Andhra Pradesh 111 112
West Bengal 105 105
Kerala 109 113

It is worth noting that South Korea also displayed high rates of son preference from 1950-1990. But the sex ratio at birth peaked in 1990 and is now approaching the natural level, of 109 males to 100 females. A major reason for this development was that in the late nineties South Korea, already concerned about falling fertility rates, outlawed the use of sonograms for sex selections; one result was a rise in the ratio of girl to boy births in South Korea.

India has also banned ultrasound scans for the sole purpose of fetus sex determination. Also in India, sex-selective abortions are nominally illegal, but these bans have proven difficult to enforce.

Note that in societies where 4, 5 or 6 children were common in the sixties , a boy would almost certainly come along eventually. So son preference did not need to come at the expense of daughters .

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Economic development for the 21st century. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2015 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11747/1.12
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Economic development for the 21st century' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask