<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
An appreciation of the work of the legendary I.J. Good, one of the world's leading statisticians. This essay is included in The Good Book: Thirty Years of Comments, Conjectures and Conclusions by I.J. Good, available in print from Rice University Press (http://ricepress.rice.edu).

(This module helps introduce The Good Book: Thirty Years of Comments, Conjectures and Conclusions, by I.J. Good . The book is available for purchase from the Rice University Press Store . You can also visit the Rice University Press web site .)

Irving john good: the man

Humata, Hukhta and Hvarshta are the three guiding principles of Zoroastrianism, a philosophical conception of deity that came out of Persia before the timeof Christ. Translated from the ancient language of Avesta , these words mean Good Thoughts, Good Words, and Good Deeds.

Jack Good, a mathematician, a statistician, a computer scientist, a philosopher, and a chess expert, is well known for his good thoughts. Oneonly need read Good (1983) on Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications . On the matter of Good Words, those of us fortunate to know Jack cannot recall having heard him utter an unkind wordor a disparaging comment about anyone. A possible exception could be Good (1990), wherein he calls R. A. Fisher “... a great practitioner but amediocre philosopher.” Finally, on the matter of Good Deeds, what can be better than a Good-like deed of generously citing the work of othercolleagues, no matter how inconsequential the work? Jack therefore fully deserves the accolade of being called “The Good Zoroastrian,” orparaphrasing Rudyard Kipling, “You are a better Zoroastrian than I, Irving John.”

Jack good: an appreciation

David Banks wanted of me an “appreciation” of Jack's work. By this I am presuming that David wanted me to reflect on the impact of Jack's writingson reliability, survival analysis, and quality control, broadly labeled the assurance sciences. I am grateful to David for this opportunity because it motivated me to re-visit some of Jack's writings, beginning with his earliest on Probability and the Weighing of Evidence (1950), to one of his latest on “Subjective Probability” (1990). Sandwiched betweenthese is an impressive list of over two thousand articles and books, some of the more notable ones (to me) being “Rational Decisions” (1952), “A Theoryof Causality” (1959), “The Estimation of Probabilities” (1965), “A Subjective Evaluation of Bode's Law” (1969), “Dynamic Probability, ComputerChess, and the Measurement of Knowledge” (1977), “Some History of the Hierarchical Bayesian Methodology” (1981), and then of course suchtitillating titles as “Quantum Mechanics and Yoga” (1963), and “Good Saw That It Was God(d)” (1975). But since my present charge is to focus onthe assurance sciences, I will, in what follows, say a few words about this.

Traditionally, and up until recently, the point of view adopted by most reliability theorists and life data analysts is that reliability is aprobability. The fact that there could be different kinds of probability has been an alien concept, and continues to be so in survival analysis. In Good(1965), the different interpretations of probability are carefully articulated. These are: chance or propensity (a physical probability),psychological probability, subjective probability, and credibility (or a logical probability). In Good (1990), the focus is on subjective probability;also given there is a dendroidal classification of the different kinds of probability and usages of the term. A consequence of these writings,together with those of de Finetti, Savage, and Lindley, is that reliability is now seen as an unknown chance (or propensity), and one's uncertaintyabout the reliability, expressed as a personal probability, is labelled survivability [cf. Singpurwalla (2006), “Reliability and Risk: A Bayesian Perspective”].

This distinction between reliability and survivability has far-reaching ramifications. For one, it makes survivability assessments dynamic. Foranother, it brings into play the hierarchical nature of probabilities (first via chance, and then via a subjective probability imposed on chance).Finally, it imparts a sense of truthfulness in the context of life-time assessments, because in actuality one ends obtaining an item'ssurvivability, not its reliability. The former is personal and subjective; the latter is abstract and unobservable. Hierarchical probabilities alsocome into play when assessing network and system integrity. Good has commented on the hierarchical and dynamic nature of probability as early as1965 and perhaps earlier.

The impact of Good's other works on the assurance sciences pertains to acceptance sampling based on life-test data using the weighing of evidenceconcept via Bayes' Factors, information gleaned from life test data and the design of life testing experiments, and the classification of interdependentfailures as being cascading or causal. Good's discussion of rational behavior and the utility of a distribution [Good (1968)]takes a tangible form when one needs to apportion reliability between the nodes of a networkand when one needs to choose systems with competing designs. For a flavor of these topics, see Singpurwalla (2006) and the references therein.

All in all, Good's writings are so plentiful and so diverse that one canfind their impact on a wide variety of topics in mathematics, statistics, operations research, philosophy, psychology, parapsychology, physics, andeven yoga! For this broad body of work, Jack deserves deep appreciation from us allfor his contributions to our learning.

Questions & Answers

A golfer on a fairway is 70 m away from the green, which sits below the level of the fairway by 20 m. If the golfer hits the ball at an angle of 40° with an initial speed of 20 m/s, how close to the green does she come?
Aislinn Reply
cm
tijani
what is titration
John Reply
what is physics
Siyaka Reply
A mouse of mass 200 g falls 100 m down a vertical mine shaft and lands at the bottom with a speed of 8.0 m/s. During its fall, how much work is done on the mouse by air resistance
Jude Reply
Can you compute that for me. Ty
Jude
what is the dimension formula of energy?
David Reply
what is viscosity?
David
what is inorganic
emma Reply
what is chemistry
Youesf Reply
what is inorganic
emma
Chemistry is a branch of science that deals with the study of matter,it composition,it structure and the changes it undergoes
Adjei
please, I'm a physics student and I need help in physics
Adjanou
chemistry could also be understood like the sexual attraction/repulsion of the male and female elements. the reaction varies depending on the energy differences of each given gender. + masculine -female.
Pedro
A ball is thrown straight up.it passes a 2.0m high window 7.50 m off the ground on it path up and takes 1.30 s to go past the window.what was the ball initial velocity
Krampah Reply
2. A sled plus passenger with total mass 50 kg is pulled 20 m across the snow (0.20) at constant velocity by a force directed 25° above the horizontal. Calculate (a) the work of the applied force, (b) the work of friction, and (c) the total work.
Sahid Reply
you have been hired as an espert witness in a court case involving an automobile accident. the accident involved car A of mass 1500kg which crashed into stationary car B of mass 1100kg. the driver of car A applied his brakes 15 m before he skidded and crashed into car B. after the collision, car A s
Samuel Reply
can someone explain to me, an ignorant high school student, why the trend of the graph doesn't follow the fact that the higher frequency a sound wave is, the more power it is, hence, making me think the phons output would follow this general trend?
Joseph Reply
Nevermind i just realied that the graph is the phons output for a person with normal hearing and not just the phons output of the sound waves power, I should read the entire thing next time
Joseph
Follow up question, does anyone know where I can find a graph that accuretly depicts the actual relative "power" output of sound over its frequency instead of just humans hearing
Joseph
"Generation of electrical energy from sound energy | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore" ***ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7150687?reload=true
Ryan
what's motion
Maurice Reply
what are the types of wave
Maurice
answer
Magreth
progressive wave
Magreth
hello friend how are you
Muhammad Reply
fine, how about you?
Mohammed
hi
Mujahid
A string is 3.00 m long with a mass of 5.00 g. The string is held taut with a tension of 500.00 N applied to the string. A pulse is sent down the string. How long does it take the pulse to travel the 3.00 m of the string?
yasuo Reply
Who can show me the full solution in this problem?
Reofrir Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Introductory material to the good book: thirty years of comments, conjectures and conclusions. OpenStax CNX. Sep 12, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10572/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Introductory material to the good book: thirty years of comments, conjectures and conclusions' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask