Consider the
$1\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{kg}$ suitcase on the cupboard that was discussed earlier. When the suitcase falls, it will gain velocity (fall faster), until it reaches the ground with a maximum velocity. The suitcase will not have any kinetic energy when it is on top of the cupboard because it is not moving. Once it starts to fall it will gain kinetic energy, because it gains velocity. Its kinetic energy will increase until it is a maximum when the suitcase reaches the ground.
A
$1\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{kg}$ brick falls off a
$4\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m$ high roof. It reaches the ground with a velocity of
$\mathrm{8,85}\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m\xb7s{}^{-1}$ . What is the kinetic energy of the brick when it starts to fall and when it reaches the ground?
The mass of the rock
$m=1\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{kg}$
The velocity of the rock at the bottom
${v}_{\mathrm{bottom}}=\mathrm{8,85}\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m\xb7$ s
${}^{-1}$
These are both in the correct units so we do not have to worry about unit
conversions.
We are asked to find the kinetic energy of the brick at the top and the bottom. From the definition we know that to work out
$KE$ , we need to know the mass and the velocity of the object and we are given both of these values.
Since the brick is not moving at the top, its kinetic energy is zero.
According to the equation for kinetic energy, the unit should be
$\mathrm{kg}\xb7m{}^{2}\xb7s{}^{-2}$ . We can prove that this unit is equal to the joule, the unit for energy.
A bullet, having a mass of
$150\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}g$ , is shot with a muzzle velocity of
$960\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m\xb7s{}^{-1}$ . Calculate its kinetic energy.
We are given the mass of the bullet
$m=150\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}g$ . This is not the
unit we want mass to be in. We need to convert to kg.
We are given the initial velocity with which the bullet leaves the barrel, called the muzzle velocity, and it is
$v=960\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m\xb7s{}^{-1}$ .
We are asked to find the kinetic energy.
We just substitute the mass and velocity (which are known) into the equation for kinetic energy:
Describe the relationship between an object's kinetic energy and its:
mass and
velocity
A stone with a mass of
$100\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}g$ is thrown up into the air. It has an initial velocity of
$3\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}m\xb7s{}^{-1}$ . Calculate its kinetic energy
as it leaves the thrower's hand.
when it reaches its turning point.
A car with a mass of
$700\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{kg}$ is travelling at a constant velocity of
$100\phantom{\rule{2pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}\xb7\mathrm{hr}{}^{-1}$ . Calculate the kinetic energy of the car.
Mechanical energy
Mechanical energy is the sum of the gravitational potential energy and the kinetic energy.
Mechanical energy,
$U$ , is simply the sum of gravitational potential energy (
$PE$ ) and the kinetic energy (
$KE$ ). Mechanical energy is defined as:
Questions & Answers
can someone help me with some logarithmic and exponential equations.
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field .
1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc
2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc
3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc.
and may other field for details you can check at Google
Azam
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
Prasenjit
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change .
maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
Azam
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
Prasenjit
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
Damian
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
Damian
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
Azam
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.