<< Chapter < Page
  Adaptive filters   Page 1 / 1
Chapter >> Page >
  • Lms

    remains the simplest and best algorithm when slow convergence is not a serious issue (typically used) O N
  • Nlms

    simple extension of the LMS with much faster convergence in many cases (very commonly used) O N
  • Frequency-domain methods

    offer computational savings ( O N ) for long filters and usually offer faster convergence, too (sometimes used; very commonly used whenthere are already FFTs in the system)
  • Lattice methods

    are stable and converge quickly, but cost substantially more than LMS and have higher residualEMSE than many methods (very occasionally used) O N
  • Rls

    algorithms that converge quickly and are stable exist. However, they are considerably more expensivethan LMS. (almost never used) O N
  • Block rls

    (least squares) methods exist and can be pretty efficient in some cases. (occasionally used) O N , O N , O N 2
  • Iir

    methods are difficult to implement successfully and pose certain difficulties, but are sometimesused in some applications, for example noise cancellation of low frequency noise (very occasionally used)
  • Cma

    very useful when applicable (blind equalization); CMA is the method for blind equalizer initialization (commonly used in a few specific equalization applications) O N
In general, getting adaptive filters to work well in an application is much more challenging than, say, FFTs or IIRfilters; they generally require lots of tweaking!

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Adaptive filters. OpenStax CNX. May 12, 2005 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10280/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Adaptive filters' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask