# 2.1 Waves

 Page 1 / 1
The wave equation and some basic properties of its solution are given

## The wave equation

In deriving the motion of a string under tension we came up with an equation:

$\frac{{\partial }^{2}y}{\partial {x}^{2}}=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}y}{\partial {t}^{2}}$ which is known as the wave equation. We will show that this leads to waves below, but first, let us note the fact that solutions of this equation can beadded to give additional solutions.

Say you have two waves governed by two equations Since they are traveling in the same medium, ${\text{v}}$ is the same $\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{1}}{\partial {x}^{2}}=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{1}}{\partial {t}^{2}}$ $\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{2}}{\partial {x}^{2}}=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{2}}{\partial {t}^{2}}$ add these $\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{1}}{\partial {x}^{2}}+\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{2}}{\partial {x}^{2}}=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{1}}{\partial {t}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}{f}_{2}}{\partial {t}^{2}}$ $\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {x}^{2}}\left({f}_{1}+{f}_{2}\right)=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {t}^{2}}\left({f}_{1}+{f}_{2}\right)$ Thus ${f}_{1}+{f}_{2}$ is a solution to the wave equation

Lets say we have two functions, ${f}_{1}\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ and ${f}_{2}\left(x+{\text{v}}t\right)$ . Each of these functions individually satisfy the wave equation. note that $y={f}_{1}\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)+{f}_{2}\left(x+{\text{v}}t\right)$ will also satisfy the wave equation. In fact any number of functions of the form $f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ or $f\left(x+{\text{v}}t\right)$ can be added together and will satisfy the wave equation. This is a very profound property of waves. For example it will allow us to describe a verycomplex wave form, as the summation of simpler wave forms. The fact that waves add is a consequence of the fact that the wave equation $\frac{{\partial }^{2}f}{\partial {x}^{2}}=\frac{1}{{{\text{v}}}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}f}{\partial {t}^{2}}$ is linear, that is $f$ and its derivatives only appear to first order. Thus any linear combination of solutions of the equation is itself a solution to the equation.

## General form

Any well behaved (ie. no discontinuities, differentiable) function of the form $y=f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ is a solution to the wave equation. Lets define ${f}^{\prime }\left(a\right)=\frac{df}{da}$ and ${f}^{\prime \prime }\left(a\right)=\frac{{d}^{2}f}{d{a}^{2}}\text{.}$ Then using the chain rule $\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}\frac{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}{\partial x}\\ =\frac{\partial f}{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}={f}^{\prime }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\text{,}\end{array}$ and $\frac{{\partial }^{2}y}{\partial {x}^{2}}={f}^{\prime \prime }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\text{.}$ Also $\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial y}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}\frac{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}{\partial t}\\ =-{\text{v}}\frac{\partial f}{\partial \left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}\\ =-{\text{v}}{f}^{\prime }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\end{array}$ $\frac{{\partial }^{2}y}{\partial {t}^{2}}={{\text{v}}}^{2}{f}^{\prime \prime }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\text{.}$ We see that this satisfies the wave equation.

Lets take the example of a Gaussian pulse. $f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)=A{e}^{-{\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}^{2}/2{\sigma }^{2}}$

Then $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\frac{-2\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}{2{\sigma }^{2}}A{e}^{-{\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}^{2}/2{\sigma }^{2}}$ 

and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=\frac{-2\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\left(-{\text{v}}\right)}{2{\sigma }^{2}}A{e}^{-{\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}^{2}/2{\sigma }^{2}}$  or $\frac{{\partial }^{2}f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}{\partial {t}^{2}}={{\text{v}}}^{2}\frac{{\partial }^{2}f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)}{\partial {x}^{2}}$ That is it satisfies the wave equation.

## The velocity of a wave

To find the velocity of a wave, consider the wave: $y\left(x,t\right)=f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ Then can see that if you increase time and x by $\Delta t$ and $\Delta x$ for a point on the traveling wave of constant amplitude $f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)=f\left(\left(x+\Delta x\right)-{\text{v}}\left(t+\Delta t\right)\right)\text{.}$ Which is true if $\Delta x-{\text{v}}\Delta t=0$ or ${\text{v}}=\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}$ Thus $f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ describes a wave that is moving in the positive $x$ direction. Likewise $f\left(x+{\text{v}}t\right)$ describes a wave moving in the negative x direction.

Lots of students get this backwards so watch out!

Another way to picture this is to consider a one dimensional wave pulse of arbitrary shape, described by ${y}^{\prime }=f\left({x}^{\prime }\right)$ , fixed to a coordinate system ${O}^{\prime }\left({x}^{\prime },{y}^{\prime }\right)$

Now let the ${O}^{\prime }$ system, together with the pulse, move to the right along the x-axis at uniform speed v relative to a fixed coordinate system $O\left(x,y\right)$ . As it moves, the pulse is assumed to maintain its shape. Any point P on the pulsecan be described by either of two coordinates $x$ or ${x}^{\prime }$ , where ${x}^{\prime }=x-{\text{v}}t$ . The $y$ coordinate is identical in either system. In the stationary coordinate system's frame of reference, the moving pulse has the mathematical form $y={y}^{\prime }=f\left({x}^{\prime }\right)=f\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ If the pulse moves to the left, the sign of v must be reversed, so that we maywrite $y=f\left(x±{\text{v}}t\right)$ as the general form of a traveling wave. Notice that we have assumed $x={x}^{\prime }$ at $t=0$ .

Waves carry momentum, energy (possibly angular momentum) but not matter

## Wavelength, wavenumber etc.

We will often use a sinusoidal form for the wave. However we can't use $y=A{\mathrm{sin}}\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)$ since the part in brackets has dimensions of length. Instead we use $y=A{\mathrm{sin}}\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\text{.}$ Notice that $y\left(x=0,t\right)=y\left(x=\lambda ,t\right)$ which gives us the definition of the wavelength $\lambda$ .

Also note that the frequency is $\nu =\frac{{\text{v}}}{\lambda }\text{.}$ The angular frequency is defined to be $\omega \equiv 2\pi \nu =\frac{2\pi {\text{v}}}{\lambda }\text{.}$ Finally the wave number is $k\equiv \frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\text{.}$ So we could have written our wave as $y=A{\mathrm{sin}}\left(kx-\omega t\right)$ Note that some books say $k=\frac{1}{\lambda }$

## Normal modes on a string as an example of wave addition

Lets go back to our solution for normal modes on a string: ${y}_{n}\left(x,t\right)={A}_{n}{\mathrm{sin}}\left(\frac{2\pi x}{{\lambda }_{n}}\right){\mathrm{cos}}{\omega }_{n}t$ ${y}_{n}\left(x,t\right)={A}_{n}{\mathrm{sin}}\left(\frac{2\pi x}{{\lambda }_{n}}\right){\mathrm{cos}}\left(\frac{2\pi }{{\lambda }_{n}}{\text{v}}t\right)\text{.}$ Now lets do the following: make use of ${\mathrm{sin}}\left(\theta +\phi \right)+{\mathrm{sin}}\left(\theta -\phi \right)=2{\mathrm{sin}}\theta {\mathrm{cos}}\phi$ Also lets just take the first normal mode and drop the n's Finally, define $A\equiv {A}_{1}/2$ Then $y\left(x,t\right)=2A{\mathrm{sin}}\left(\frac{2\pi x}{\lambda }\right){\mathrm{cos}}\left(\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }{\text{v}}t\right)$ becomes $y\left(x,t\right)=A{\mathrm{sin}}\left[\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\left(x-{\text{v}}t\right)\right]+A{\mathrm{sin}}\left[\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\left(x+{\text{v}}t\right)\right]$ These are two waves of equal amplitude and speed traveling in opposite directions.We can plot what happens when we do this. The following animation was made with Mathematica using the command

a perfect square v²+2v+_
kkk nice
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
or infinite solutions?
Kim
y=10×
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
is it 3×y ?
J, combine like terms 7x-4y
im not good at math so would this help me
how did I we'll learn this
f(x)= 2|x+5| find f(-6)
f(n)= 2n + 1
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
preparation of nanomaterial
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!