# 2.4 Find multiples and factors  (Page 2/9)

 Page 2 / 9

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $5.$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}675\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}1,578$

1. yes
2. no

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $5.$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}421\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2,690$

1. no
2. yes

[link] highlights the multiples of $10$ between $1$ and $50.$ All multiples of $10$ all end with a zero.

Determine whether each of the following is a multiple of $10\text{:}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}425\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}350$

## Solution

 ⓐ Is 425 a multiple of 10? Is the last digit zero? No. 425 is not a multiple of 10.
 ⓑ Is 350 a multiple of 10? Is the last digit zero? Yes. 350 is a multiple of 10.

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $10\text{:}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}179\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}3,540$

1. no
2. yes

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $10\text{:}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}110\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}7,595$

1. yes
2. no

[link] highlights multiples of $3.$ The pattern for multiples of $3$ is not as obvious as the patterns for multiples of $2,5,\text{and}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}10.$

Unlike the other patterns we’ve examined so far, this pattern does not involve the last digit. The pattern for multiples of $3$ is based on the sum of the digits. If the sum of the digits of a number is a multiple of $3,$ then the number itself is a multiple of $3.$ See [link] .

 $\mathbf{\text{Multiple of 3}}$ $3$ $6$ $9$ $12$ $15$ $18$ $21$ $24$ $\mathbf{\text{Sum of digits}}$ $3$ $6$ $9$ $\begin{array}{c}\hfill 1+2\hfill \\ \hfill 3\hfill \end{array}$ $\begin{array}{c}\hfill 1+5\hfill \\ \hfill 6\hfill \end{array}$ $\begin{array}{c}\hfill 1+8\hfill \\ \hfill 9\hfill \end{array}$ $\begin{array}{c}\hfill 2+1\hfill \\ \hfill 3\hfill \end{array}$ $\begin{array}{c}\hfill 2+4\hfill \\ \hfill 6\hfill \end{array}$

Consider the number $42.$ The digits are $4$ and $2,$ and their sum is $4+2=6.$ Since $6$ is a multiple of $3,$ we know that $42$ is also a multiple of $3.$

Determine whether each of the given numbers is a multiple of $3\text{:}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}645\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}10,519$

## Solution

Is $645$ a multiple of $3?$

 Find the sum of the digits. $6+4+5=15$ Is 15 a multiple of 3? Yes. If we're not sure, we could add its digits to find out. We can check it by dividing 645 by 3. $645÷3$ The quotient is 215. $3\cdot 215=645$

Is $10,519$ a multiple of $3?$

 Find the sum of the digits. $1+0+5+1+9=16$ Is 16 a multiple of 3? No. So 10,519 is not a multiple of 3 either.. $645÷3$ We can check this by dividing by 10,519 by 3. $\begin{array}{c}3,506\text{R}1\\ \hfill 3\overline{)10,519}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\end{array}$

When we divide $10,519$ by $3,$ we do not get a counting number, so $10,519$ is not the product of a counting number and $3.$ It is not a multiple of $3.$

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $3\text{:}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}954\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}3,742$

1. yes
2. no

Determine whether each number is a multiple of $3\text{:}$

1. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}643\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}$
2. $\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}8,379$

1. no
2. yes

Look back at the charts where you highlighted the multiples of $2,$ of $5,$ and of $10.$ Notice that the multiples of $10$ are the numbers that are multiples of both $2$ and $5.$ That is because $10=2\cdot 5.$ Likewise, since $6=2\cdot 3,$ the multiples of $6$ are the numbers that are multiples of both $2$ and $3.$

## Use common divisibility tests

Another way to say that $375$ is a multiple of $5$ is to say that $375$ is divisible by $5.$ In fact, $375÷5$ is $75,$ so $375$ is $5\cdot 75.$ Notice in [link] that $10,519$ is not a multiple $3.$ When we divided $10,519$ by $3$ we did not get a counting number, so $10,519$ is not divisible by $3.$

## Divisibility

If a number $m$ is a multiple of $n,$ then we say that $m$ is divisible by $n.$

Since multiplication and division are inverse operations, the patterns of multiples that we found can be used as divisibility tests. [link] summarizes divisibility tests for some of the counting numbers between one and ten.

Divisibility Tests
A number is divisible by
$2$ if the last digit is $0,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}4,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}6,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{or}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}8$
$3$ if the sum of the digits is divisible by $3$
$5$ if the last digit is $5$ or $0$
$6$ if divisible by both $2$ and $3$
$10$ if the last digit is $0$

Determine whether $1,290$ is divisible by $2,3,5,\text{and}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}10.$

## Solution

[link] applies the divisibility tests to $1,290.$ In the far right column, we check the results of the divisibility tests by seeing if the quotient is a whole number.

Divisible by…? Test Divisible? Check
$2$ Is last digit $0,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}4,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}6,\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{or}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}8?$ Yes. yes $1290÷2=645$
$3$ $\text{Is sum of digits divisible by}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}3?$
$1+2+9+0=12$ Yes.
yes $1290÷3=430$
$5$ Is last digit is $5$ or $0?$ Yes. yes $1290÷5=258$
$10$ Is last digit $0?$ Yes. yes $1290÷10=129$

Thus, $1,290$ is divisible by $2,3,5,\text{and}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}10.$

Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
are you nano engineer ?
s.
what is the Synthesis, properties,and applications of carbon nano chemistry
so some one know about replacing silicon atom with phosphorous in semiconductors device?
Yeah, it is a pain to say the least. You basically have to heat the substarte up to around 1000 degrees celcius then pass phosphene gas over top of it, which is explosive and toxic by the way, under very low pressure.
Harper
how to fabricate graphene ink ?
for screen printed electrodes ?
SUYASH
What is lattice structure?
of graphene you mean?
Ebrahim
or in general
Ebrahim
in general
s.
Graphene has a hexagonal structure
tahir
On having this app for quite a bit time, Haven't realised there's a chat room in it.
Cied
what is biological synthesis of nanoparticles
what's the easiest and fastest way to the synthesize AgNP?
China
Cied
types of nano material
I start with an easy one. carbon nanotubes woven into a long filament like a string
Porter
many many of nanotubes
Porter
what is the k.e before it land
Yasmin
what is the function of carbon nanotubes?
Cesar
I'm interested in nanotube
Uday
what is nanomaterials​ and their applications of sensors.
what is nano technology
what is system testing?
preparation of nanomaterial
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
what is system testing
what is the application of nanotechnology?
Stotaw
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field . 1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc 2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc 3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc. and may other field for details you can check at Google
Azam
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
Prasenjit
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change . maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
Azam
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
Prasenjit
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
Damian
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
Damian
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
Azam
Hello
Uday
I'm interested in Nanotube
Uday
this technology will not going on for the long time , so I'm thinking about femtotechnology 10^-15
Prasenjit
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Good
How do i figure this problem out.
how do you translate this in Algebraic Expressions
why surface tension is zero at critical temperature
Shanjida
I think if critical temperature denote high temperature then a liquid stats boils that time the water stats to evaporate so some moles of h2o to up and due to high temp the bonding break they have low density so it can be a reason
s.
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?