<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
A universal belief is that good principals create and sustain dynamic efforts for school reform, and without them, schools would not succeed. School success is dependent on effective school leadership. There is growing fear, however, that the principal’s increasing responsibilities and the ability to lead are becoming unrealistic, and school success will suffer in the wake of the leader’s overwhelming role.
This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and sanctioned by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a significant contribution to the scholarship and practice of education administration. Author: Jan Walker, Associate Professor, Department of Educational Leadership, Drake University

The multiple demands and job expansion of the leader-manager

Historically, the principal’s role was typically that of manager, a concept derived from management principles first applied to industry and commerce and adopted by the educational system (Bush, 2008). The responsibilities of the leader-manager included maintaining safe buildings, overseeing the budget, completing and submitting reports, complying with regulations and mandates, coping with personnel issues, and dealing with parents (Portin, Shen,&Williams, 1998). Being a good building manager was once sufficient, but the principal’s role has expanded. The job today necessitates the emergence of a new kind of leader with the focus shifting from accountability for how resources are expended to include accountability for student achievement (Cooley&Shen, 2003).

Effective schools research in the 1980s essentially gave birth to the connection between the school leader and student achievement and recent studies of successful schools continue to connect strong school instructional leadership to higher student achievement (Hallinger&Heck, 1996; Institute for Educational Leadership, 2000; Leithwood, Louis, Anderson,&Wahlstrom, 2004; Waters, Marzano,&McNulty, 2003). Although the need for both instructional leadership and management exists, the conflicting demands and layering of responsibilities have dramatically impacted the role of the principal (Chirichello, 2003; DiPaola&Tschannen-Moran, 2003; Duffie, 1991; Portin et al., 1998).

Due to the increased level of responsibilities, the principal’s job extends to 60-80 hours per week and includes supervision of weekend and evening activities (Cushing, Kerrins, Johnstone, 2003; DiPaola&Tschannen-Moran, 2003; Ferrandino&Tirozzi, 2000; Pierce, 2000; Yerkes&Guaglianone, 1998). In 1995 the Association of Washington School Principals (Portin et al., 1998) conducted a statewide survey of their membership to determine the changes in the educational environment and their influence on work life of principals. Over 90% of the respondents reported an increase in the scope of their responsibilities. More specifically, 83% indicated increased interactions with parents, 77% said they had greater numbers of students requiring services, and 81% said there had been a substantial increase in managerial responsibilities. Approximately 90% of the principals in this study indicated they spent more hours in their job now than they did five years ago. Many of the principals reported feelings of frustration and were less enthusiastic about their jobs.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 1; february 2009. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10630/1.9
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 1; february 2009' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask