<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

References

  • Andrade MB. 1996. Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271: 70-72.
  • Andrade MB. 1998. Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behavior despite male sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol. 9: 33-42.
  • Andrade MB. 2003. Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol. 14: 531-538.
  • Andrade MB, Snow LS. 2005. Multiple sperm storage organs facilitate female control of paternity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 270: 1623-1629.
  • Araqvist G, Henriksson S. 1997. Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol. 11:253-271.
  • Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME. 2008. Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity. Behav Ecol. 19: 710-715.
  • Bilde T, Tuni C, Elsayed R, Pekar S, Toft S. 2006. Death feigning in the face of sexual cannibalism. Biol Lett. 2: 23-25.
  • Birkhead TR, Lee KE, Young P. 1988. Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis Hierodula membrnacea . Behavior 106: 112-118.
  • Blanckenhorn WU. 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms so small? Quart Rev Biol 75: 385-407.
  • Bonduriansky R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev. 76: 305-339.
  • Bukowski RC, Linn CD, Christenson TE. 2001. Copulation and sperm release in Gasteracantha cancriformis (Araneae : Araneidae) differential male behaviour based on female mating history. Anim Behav. 62: 887-895.
  • Buskirk RE, Frohlich C, Ross KG. The natural selection of sexual cannibalism. Am Nat. 1984. 123:612-625.
  • Chapman T, Partridge L. 1996. Sexual Conflict as Fuel for Evolution. Nature 381: 189- 190.
  • Choe JC. 1995. Courtship feeding and repeated mating in Zorotypus barberi (Insecta: Zoraptera). Anim Behav. 49: 1511-1520.
  • Eberhard WG. 2000. Criteria for demonstrating postcopulatory female choice. Ev. 54: 1047-1050.
  • Eberhard WG. 2004. Why study spider sex? Special traits of spiders facilitate studies of sperm competition and cryptic female choice. J. Arachnol. 32: 545-556.
  • Eisenberg RM, Hurd LE, Bartley JA. 1981. Ecological consequences of food limitation for adult mantids ( Tenodera ardifolia sinensis Saussure ). Am Mid Nat. 106: 209- 218.
  • Elgar MA. 1991. Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128-155.
  • Elgar MA, Bathgate R. 1996. Female receptivity and male mate-guarding in the jewel spider, Gasteracantha minax . Journal Insec Behav. 9: 729-738.
  • Elgar MA, Nash DR. 1988. Sexual cannibalism in the garden spider Araneus diadematus . Anim Behav. 36: 1511-1517.
  • Elgar MA, Schneider JM, Herberstein ME. 2000. Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi . R Soc Lond. 267: 2439-2443.
  • Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ. 2003. Spontaneous male death during copulation of an orb- weaving spider. The Roy Soc. 270: 183-185.
  • Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ. 2004. Males under attack: sexual cannibalism and its consequences for male morphology and behavior in an orb-weaving spider. Evol Ecol Res. 6: 163-181.
  • Forster LM. 1992. The stereotyped behavior of sexual cannibalism in Latrodectus hasselti (Araneae: Theridiiidae), the Australian redback spider. Aus Jour Zool. 40: 1-11.
  • Fox LR. 1975a. Cannibalism in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 6: 87-106.
  • Fox LR. 1975b. Factors influencing cannibalism, a mechanism of population limitation in the predator Notonecta hoffmanni . Ecology. 56: 933-941.
  • Gemeno C, Claramunt J. 2006. Sexual approach in the praying mantid mantis religiosa . J Insect Behav. 19: 731-740.
  • Gould, SJ. 1997. The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype. Natl Acad Sci. 94: 10750-10755.
  • Haddon M. 1995. Avoidance of post-cloital cannibalism in the brachyurid paddle crab Ovalipes catharus . Oecologia 104: 256-258.
  • Hebets EA. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Nat Academ of Sci. 100: 13390-13395.
  • Hebets EA, Wesson J, Shamble PS. 2008. Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders. Anim Behav. 76: 355-363.
  • Hellriegel B, Ward PI. 1998. Complex female reproductive tract morphology: its possible use in postcopulatory female choice. J. Theor. Biol. 190: 179-186.
  • Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Kramer DL. 2003. The role of energy availability in mammalian hibernation: a cost-benefit approach. Phys and Bioch Zool. 76: 165-179.
  • Hurd LE, Eisenberg RM, Fagan WF. 1994. Cannibalism revereses male-biased sex ratio in adult mantids: female strategy against food limitation? Oikos. 69:193-198.
  • Lang A. 1996. Silk investments in gifts by males of the nuptial feeding spider Pisaura mirabilis (Araneae: Pisauridae). Behav. 133: 697-716.
  • Lelito JP, Brown WD. 2006. Complicity or conflict over sexual cannibalism? Male risk taking in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis . Am Nat. 168: 263-269.
  • Liske E. 1991. Sensorimotor control of abdominal mating movements in the male praying mantis. Zool J Physiol. 95: 465-473.
  • Liske E, Davis WJ. 1984. Sexual behavior of the Chinese praying mantis. Anim Behav. 32: 916-918
  • Liske E, Davis WJ. 1987. Courtship and mating behavior of the Chinese praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia sinensis . Anim Behav. 35: 1524-1537.
  • Megina C, Cervera JL. 2002. Diet, prey selection a nd cannibalism in the hunter opisthobranch Roboastra europaea . Jour Marin Biol Assoc UK 83: 489-495.
  • Morse DH. 2004. A test of sexual cannibalism models, using a sit-and-wait predator. Biol J Linn Soc. 81:427-437.
  • Newman JA, Elgar MA. 1991. Sexual cannibalism in orb-weaving spiders: an economic model. Am Nat. 138: 1372-1395.
  • Persons MH, Uetz GW. 2003. Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characteristics. Anim Behav. 69:83-94.
  • Prenter J, MacNeil C, Elwood RW. 2006. Sexual cannibalism and mate choice. Anim Behav. 71: 481-490.
  • Rabaneda-Bueno R et al. 2008. Sexual cannibalism: high incidence in a natural population with benefits to females. PlosOne. 3:1-10.
  • Robinson MH, Robinson B. 1979. By dawn’s early light: matutinal mating and sex attractants in a neotropical mantid. Science 204: 825-827.
  • Rubenstein DI 1987. Alternative reproductive tactics in the spider Meta segmentata . Behav Ecol and Sociol. 20: 229-237.
  • Siller S. 2001. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex. Nature 411: 689-692.
  • Sasaki T, Iwahashi O. 1995. Sexual cannibalism in an orb-weaving spider Argiope aemula . Anim Behav. 49: 1119-1121.
  • Schneider JM, Elgar MA. 2001. Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition on the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav Ecol.12: 547-552.
  • Schneider JM, Fromhage L. 2005. Safe sex with feeding females: sexual conflict in a cannibalistic spider. Behav Ecol. 16: 377-382.
  • Shneider JM, Lubin Y. 1998. Intersexual conflict in spiders. Oikos 83: 496-506.
  • Schneider JM, Fromhage L, Uhl G. 2003. Fitness consequences of sexual cannibalism in female Argiope bruennichi . Behav Ecol and Sociob. 55: 60-64.
  • Schneider JM, Gilberg S, Fromhage L, Uhl G. 2006. Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Anim Behav. 71:781-788.
  • Stalhandske P. 2001. Nuptial gift in the spider Pisaura mirabilis maintained by sexual selection. Behav Ecol. 12: 691-697.
  • Thornhill R. 1976a. Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat. 110: 153-163.
  • Thornhill R. 1976b. Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis . Am Nat.110: 529-548.
  • Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider J. 2007. Copulatory mechanism in a sexually cannibalistic spider with genital mutilation (Araneae: Araneidae: Argiope bruennichi). Zool. 100: 398-408.
  • Vollrath F, Parker GA. 1992. Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature 360: 156-159.
  • Wilder SM, Rypstra AL. 2008a. Diet quality affects mating behavior and egg production in a wolf spider. Anim Behav. 76: 439-445.
  • Wilder SM, Rypstra AL. 2008b. Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders. Am Nat. 172: 431-440.
  • Yagar DD, Svenson GJ. 2008. Patterns of praying mantis auditory system evolution based on morphological, molecular, neurophysiological, and behavioral data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 541-568.

Questions & Answers

what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
What would be the best educational aid(s) for gifted kids/savants?
Heidi Reply
treat them normal, if they want help then give them. that will make everyone happy
Saurabh
What are the treatment for autism?
Magret Reply
hello. autism is a umbrella term. autistic kids have different disorder overlapping. for example. a kid may show symptoms of ADHD and also learning disabilities. before treatment please make sure the kid doesn't have physical disabilities like hearing..vision..speech problem. sometimes these
Jharna
continue.. sometimes due to these physical problems..the diagnosis may be misdiagnosed. treatment for autism. well it depends on the severity. since autistic kids have problems in communicating and adopting to the environment.. it's best to expose the child in situations where the child
Jharna
child interact with other kids under doc supervision. play therapy. speech therapy. Engaging in different activities that activate most parts of the brain.. like drawing..painting. matching color board game. string and beads game. the more you interact with the child the more effective
Jharna
results you'll get.. please consult a therapist to know what suits best on your child. and last as a parent. I know sometimes it's overwhelming to guide a special kid. but trust the process and be strong and patient as a parent.
Jharna
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior. OpenStax CNX. Jan 12, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11211/1.5
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask