0.13 Sampson, p., & Roberts, k. (october 2011). historical comparison  (Page 14/14)

The constitution does not specifically mention education as a federal government function but the 10 ^th amendment does say that anything not mentioned in the constitution is the states’ function. It is therefore concluded that education was meant to be a state function. The presidents’ vision was often a vision for the nation, which only later found education as a federal focus.

References

• Abstract of the United States, 119 ^th Edition., chart 249, p. 9.
• Aladjem, D.,&Borman, K. M. (2006). Examining comprehensive school reform . Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
• Bain, A. (2010). A longitudinal study of the practice of fidelity of a site-based school reform . The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(1) , 107-123.
• Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J.,&Nataraj Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenge of whole school reform, new American schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
• Books, S. (2004). Poverty and Schooling in the U. S.: Contexts and Consequences . Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates, Publishers.
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T.,&Brown, S. (2003) . Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
• Byrk, A., Sebring P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppesca, S.&Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Charity Organization Society of the City of New York (October 5, 1907). Charities and the commons: A weekly Journal of Philantrophy ¸19.
• Cohen, M.,&Ginsburg, A. (2001). School improvement report: Executive order on actions for turning around low-performing schools. Retrieved March 4, 2011, from www.ed.gov/offices/ous/pes/ibschools.pdf .
• Corbin, J.,&Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research 3e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Comer, J. P. (1997). Waiting for a Miracle: Why Schools Can’t Solve Our Problems and How We Can. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
• Consortium on Chicago School Research (January, 2010). Symposium on Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Retrieved form http://csr.uchicago.edu/videos/organizing_schools_symposium_20100114.php.
• Cuban, L. (1990). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. In A Lieberman (Ed.) Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now. (pp.71-77). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
• Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts . Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121-153.
• El-daly, H. M. (2010). On the philosophy of language: Searching for common grounds for pragmatics and discourse analysis. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(6), 244-262.
• Florian, J. (2000). Sustaining education reform: Influential factors . (Report No. EA 031023), Aurora, CO: Mid Continent Research for Education and Learning, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 453 583).
• Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Fullan, M. (2004) Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Gertle, P., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W.,&Hattie, J. A. (2007). Impact evaluation for school-based management reform (NO. 10). Washington, DC: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management.
• Gersten, R., Chard, D.,&Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33 (5), 445-457.
• Goodman, J. (1995). Change without difference: School restructuring in historical perspective. Harvard Educational Review, 65(1), 1-30.
• Hessel, K.,&Holloway, J. (2002). A Framework for School Leaders: Linking the ISLLC Standards to Practice. Princeton, NJ: ETS,
• Huberman, A. M.,&Miles, A. B. (1984). Innovation Up Close: How School Improvement Works. New York, NY: Plenum.
• Hunnicutt, B. K. (1988). Work with end: Abandoning shorter hours for the right to work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
• Kantor, H.,&Lowe, R. (2006) From New Deal to no deal: No Child Left Behind and the devolution of responsibility for equal opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4) , 474-502.
• Katz, M. B. (1975). Class, Bureaucracy, and Schools: The Illusion of Educational Change in America. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
• Klingner, J. K., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T.,&Vaughn, S. (2001). Examining the school wide “spread” of research-based practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(4), 221-234.
• Kurki, A., Boyle, A.,&Aladjem, D. K. (2006). Implementation: Measuring and explaining the fidelity of CSR implementation. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(3/4) . 255-277.
• Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Reforming again and again: A bumpy ride for six decades. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 28(4), 1-8.
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
• McMillan, J.,&Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education (6 ^th ed). Boston, MA: PearsonO’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33-84.
• Murphy, J.,&Beck, L. G. (1995). School-based Management as School Reform . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• National Education Association (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Bulletin No. 35.
• O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33-84.
• Phillips, J. C.,&Starratt, R. J. (2011). What is a vision of learning? The need for a national conversation among the educational leadership professoriate. UCEA Review, 52(1) , 33-38.
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system . New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Reese, W. J. (2011). America’s public schools: From the common school to No Child Left Behind. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation . New York, NY: Free Press.
• Sarason, S. B. (1993). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
• Scheurich, J. J., Goddard, R. D., Skrla, L., McKenzie, K. B.,&Youngs, P. (2010). The most important research on urban school reform in the past decade? Educational Researcher 39(9) , 665-667.
• Sindelar, P. T., Shearer, D. K., Yendol-Hoppey, D.,&Liebert, T. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children, 72(3 ), 317-331.
• Tyack, D. B.,&Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wohlstetter, P.,&Odden, A. (1992). Rethinking school-based management policy and research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(4), 529-549.
• Woodside-Jiron, H.,&Gehsmann, K. M. (2009). Peeling back the layers of policy and school reform: Revealing the structured and social complexities within . International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 56(1), 49-72.
• Zhang, Y., Shkolnik, J.,&Fashola, O. (2005). Evaluating the implementation of Comprehensive School Reform and its impact on growth in student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.