<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

These three insights seldom lead to simple or obvious political conclusions. As the famous British economist Joan Robinson wrote some decades ago: “[E]conomic theory, in itself, preaches no doctrines and cannot establish any universally valid laws. It is a method of ordering ideas and formulating questions.” The study of economics is neither politically conservative, nor moderate, nor liberal. There are economists who are Democrats, Republicans, libertarians, socialists, and members of every other political group you can name. Of course, conservatives may tend to emphasize the virtues of markets and the limitations of government, while liberals may tend to emphasize the shortcomings of markets and the need for government programs. Such differences only illustrate that the language and terminology of economics is not limited to one set of political beliefs, but can be used by all.

Chinese tire tariffs

In April 2009, the union representing U.S. tire manufacturing workers filed a request with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) , asking it to investigate tire imports from China. Under U.S. trade law, if imports from a country increase to the point that they cause market disruption in the United States, as determined by the ITC, then it can also recommend a remedy for this market disruption. In this case, the ITC determined that from 2004 to 2008, U.S. tire manufacturers suffered declines in production, financial health, and employment as a direct result of increases in tire imports from China. The ITC recommended that an additional tax be placed on tire imports from China. President Obama and Congress agreed with the ITC recommendation, and in June 2009 tariffs on Chinese tires increased from 4% to 39%.

Why would U.S. consumers buy imported tires from China in the first place? Most likely, because they are cheaper than tires produced domestically or in other countries. Therefore, this tariff increase should cause U.S. consumers to pay higher prices for tires, either because Chinese tires are now more expensive, or because U.S. consumers are pushed by the tariff to buy more expensive tires made by U.S. manufacturers or those from other countries. In the end, this tariff made U.S. consumers pay more for tires.

Was this tariff met with outrage expressed via social media, traditional media, or mass protests? Were there “Occupy Wall Street-type” demonstrations? The answer is a resounding “No.” Most U.S. tire consumers were likely unaware of the tariff increase, although they may have noticed the price increase, which was between $4 and $13 depending on the type of tire. Tire consumers are also potential voters. Conceivably, a tax increase, even a small one, might make voters unhappy. However, voters probably realized that it was not worth their time to learn anything about this issue or cast a vote based on it. They probably thought their vote would not matter in determining the outcome of an election or changing this policy.

Estimates of the impact of this tariff show it costs U.S. consumers around $1.11 billion annually. Of this amount, roughly $817 million ends up in the pockets of foreign tire manufacturers other than in China, and the remaining $294 million goes to U.S. tire manufacturers. In other words, the tariff increase on Chinese tires may have saved 1,200 jobs in the domestic tire sector, but it cost 3,700 jobs in other sectors, as consumers had to cut down on their spending because they were paying more for tires. Jobs were actually lost as a result of this tariff. Workers in U.S. tire manufacturing firms earned about $40,000 in 2010. Given the number of jobs saved and the total cost to U.S. consumers, the cost of saving one job amounted to $926,500!

This tariff caused a net decline in U.S. social surplus. (Total surplus is discussed in the Demand and Supply chapter, and tariffs are discussed in the The International Trade and Capital Flows chapter.) Instead of saving jobs, it cost jobs, and those jobs that it saved cost many times more than the people working in them could ever hope to earn. Why would the government do this?

The chapter answers this question by discussing the influence special interest groups have on economic policy. The steelworkers union, whose members make tires, saw more and more of its members lose their jobs as U.S. consumers consumed more and more cheap Chinese tires. By definition, this union is relatively small but well organized, especially compared to tire consumers. It stands to gain much for each of its members, compared to what each tire consumer may have to give up in terms of higher prices. So the steelworkers union (joined by domestic tire manufacturers) has not only the means but the incentive to lobby economic policymakers and lawmakers. Given that U.S. tire consumers are a large and unorganized group, if they even are a group, it is unlikely they will lobby against higher tire tariffs. In the end, lawmakers tend to listen to those who lobby them, even though the results make for bad economic policy.

Key concepts and summary

Majority votes can run into difficulties when more than two choices exist. A voting cycle occurs when, in a situation with at least three choices, choice A is preferred by a majority vote to choice B, choice B is preferred by a majority vote to choice C, and choice C is preferred by a majority vote to choice A. In such a situation, it is impossible to identify what the majority prefers. Another difficulty arises when the vote is so divided that no choice receives a majority.

A practical approach to microeconomic policy will need to take a realistic view of the specific strengths and weaknesses of markets and the specific strengths and weaknesses of government, rather than making the easy but wrong assumption that either the market or government is always beneficial or always harmful.


Nixon, Ron. “American Candy Makers. Pinched by Inflated Sugar Prices. Look Abroad.” The New York Times . Last modified October 30, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/us/american-candy-makers-pinched-by-inflated-sugar-prices-look-abroad.html?_r=0.

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Sean Lowry. “U.S. Tire Tariffs: Saving Few Jobs at High Cost (Policy Brief 12-9).” Peterson Institute for International Economics . Last modified April 2012.

Questions & Answers

Macroeconomic definetion
farooq Reply
I need short examples for costumer
we are costumer of this application,
Marshall 's definition
Arun Reply
perfectly competitive firm earn zero economic profit in the long run.is it true or false
Sapna Reply
False...some, in the long run earn normal profit while some zero or negative profit(loss) which forces them out of the market..
what is supply
Sapna Reply
supply is the amount of goods and services that supplies are willing and able to sell at a given price at a particular period of time.
Hey how Sapna...I have the que... I can see supply does with selling;yah that's great... So cost of production is the determinant of supply though;how does it relate to selling yet? The supply definition u just gave is not complete yet... *SUPPLY* DEFINITION HAS TO DO WITH SELLING AND PRODUCING.
what is difference between elastic and inelastic ?
saqlain Reply
what does a supply curve look like?
master Reply
It's the curve that has a positive gradient
you are right mahapa
please explain cob doglas thiory
'cardinal utility implies ordinal utility'.Do you agree?
what is relative price.?
Harpreet Reply
when the price of 2 commodity is compared with each other,the price of one commodity to another one's price is said to be relative price
business organization and industry?
history of monetary policy
Estah Reply
instrument of monetary policy
open market,funding ,bank rate
open market operation,Funding,Bank rate
thanks guys
What is elasticity?
Moses Reply
level or degree of responsiveness of change in quantity as a result of change in price
is the degree of responsiveness of a quatity demand respond to small charge in price
the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price, income or other related commodities
what are the Factor affected elastricity of demand and supply
Kelvin Reply
price of other related goods
Taste. Income.
what is economic ?
Cabdulahi Reply
what is price ceiling and price floor
Mokom Reply
price ceiling is a government deliberate act of imposing a limit on prices of goods n services sold in an economy...price floor is exactly the opposite
both are a form of price control by the government. price ceiling is the subsidy to consumer by setting maximum limit to the price and prducers of good cannot charge a higher price than this price limit which is known as price ceiling
what's the difference between average product and marginal product
Francis Reply
average cost/revenue and marginal cost/revenue
A Washington state district court currently has subject matter jurisdiction over many types of civil cases, if the amount in controversy is $150,000 or less.
Sina Reply

Get the best Microeconomics course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, Microeconomics. OpenStax CNX. Aug 03, 2014 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11627/1.10
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Microeconomics' conversation and receive update notifications?