<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

[link] plots the trajectory of the AGC gain g as it moves from the vicinity of unity to the vicinity of 2 (just what is needed to counteracta 50% fade). Increasing the stepsize mu can speed up this transition, but also increases the range of variability in the gainas it responds to short periods when the square of the received signal does not closely match its long-term average.

Soft decisions with an AGC compensating for an abrupt flat fade.
Soft decisions with an AGC compensating for an abrupt flat fade.
Trajectory of the AGC gain parameter as it moves to compensate for the fade.
Trajectory of the AGC gain parameter as it moves to compensate for the fade.

Another idealized assumption made in idsys.m is that the receiver knows the start of each frame; that is, it knows where each four-symbol group begins. This is a kind of“frame synchronization” problem and was absorbed into the specification ofa parameter l which appears in the code as 0.5*fl+M . With the default settings, l is 125. This problem poses the question. “What if this isnot known, and how can it be fixed?”

  1. Verify, using idsys.m , that the message becomes scrambled if the receiver is mistakenabout the start of each group of four. Add a random number of 4-PAM symbols before the messagesequence, but do not “tell” the receiver that you have done so (i.e., do not change l ). What value of l would fix the problem? Can l really be known before hand?
  2. [link] proposed the insertion of a marker sequence as way to synchronize the frame.Add a seven-symbol marker sequence just prior to the first character of the text.In the receiver, implement a correlator that searches for the known marker.Demonstrate the success of this modification by adding random symbols at the start of the transmission.Where in the receiver have you chosen to put the correlation procedure? Why?
  3. One quirk of the system (observed in the eye diagram in [link] ) is that each group of four begins with a negative number. Use this feature (rather than aseparate marker sequence) to create a correlator in the receiver that can be used to find the start of the frames.
  4. The previous two exercises showed two possible solutions to the frame synchronization problem. Explain the prosand cons of each method, and argue which is a “better” solution.

Other impairments: more “what ifs”

Of course, a fading channel is not the only thing that can go wrong in a telecommunication system.(Think back to the “what if” questions in the first section of this chapter.)This section considers a range of synchronization and interferenceimpairments that violate the assumptions of the idealized system. Though each impairment is studied separately(i.e., assuming that everything functions ideally except for the particular impairment of interest),a single program is written to simulate any of the impairments.The program impsys.m leaves both the transmitter and the basic operation of the receiver unchanged;the primary impairments are to the sampled sequence that is delivered to the receiver.

The rest of this chapter conducts a series of experiments dealing with stuff that can happen to the system.Interference is added to the received signal as additive gaussian channel noiseand as multipath interference. The oscillator at the transmitter is no longer presumed to be synchronized with the oscillator at the receiver.The best sample times are no longer presumed to be known exactly in either phase or period.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Software receiver design. OpenStax CNX. Aug 13, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11510/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Software receiver design' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask