<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Student responses assist MPA program faculty in curricular, instructional, and program assessment. This on-goingprocess of program development and course preparation is helpful in meeting the wide variety of students the program serves.Philosophical issues become a matter of discussion among MPA faculty and course content, development, and materials areregularly reviewed in an effort to ensure that each program’s requirements and student needs are being addressed.

Conclusion

Developing a quality innovative program is not an easy task. It is an ongoing process that requirescreativity, flexibility, collaboration, reflection, analysis, and response to public, institutional, and student concerns. There is agreat deal of overlap and hence commonality in professional standards among the three disciplines. It is important for programfaculty and instructors to be cognizant of similarities and differences between standards and ensure that required knowledgeand skills are addressed and assessed. The foundational knowledge presented in the MPA program is regularly recommended and requiredof anyone in a leadership position, whether it is in education, government, a nonprofit organization, or in the corporate world.Educational, non-profit, government, and for-profit organizations are not isolated in the world beyond academia. Members of theseorganizations interact, work together, and depend upon each other on a regular basis. What better way can there be than to preparethese future leaders together and for professors to model the integration and interactions in practice? The University ofMichigan-Dearborn is doing just that in their Masters of Public Administration program.

References

Beyer, B.,&Ruhl-Smith, C. (2000). Research and collaboration as keys to improved performance. Journalof the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 35-40.

Bolman L. G.,&Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (2nd ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Bolman, L. G.,&Deal, T. E. (2004).Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Capasso, R. L.&Daresh, J. C. (2001). The school administrator internship handbook: Leading, mentoring,and participating in the internship program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Council of Chief State School Officers.(1996). Interstate school leaders consortium: Standardsfor school leadership. Washington, DC: Author.

Cunningham, W. G.,&Cordeiro, P. A. (2000). Educational administration: 8 problem-based approachs.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Dell’Angela, T.&Washburn, G. (2004). Daley set to remake troubled schools. (2004, June 25). ChicagoTribune, pp. A1. A22.

Grossman, Kate N. (2004). Daley unveils plan to shut some schools to copy success stories. (2004, June 25).Chicago Sun-Times, METRO, p. 20.

Hersey, P.,&Blanchard, K. H. (1984). The management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoy, W. K.,&Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5thed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Hoyle, J. R., English, F. W.,&Steffy, B. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders:Standards for peak performance. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Kimbrough, R. B.,&Nunnery, M. Y. (1988). Educational administration: An introduction (3rd ed.). NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Lambert, L. (1995). Cultivating leaders. Association for California School Administrators. 24(5),6-9.

Lunenburg, F. C.,&Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (3rded.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.

McFarland, L.J., Senn, L. E.,&Childress, J. R. (1994). 21st century leadership: Dialogues with 100 top leaders. New York: The Leadership Press.

Milstein, M.,&Associates (1993). Changing the wav we prepare educational leaders: The Danforthexperience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Murphy, J.,&Hallinger, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts. NewburyPark, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Murphy, J., Hawley, W.,&Young, M. ( 2005). Re-defining the education of school leaders. NCPEA EducationLeadership Review. 6(2), 48-55.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (1993). Principals for our changing schools:Knowledge and skill base. Fairfax, VA: Author.

Newmann, F. M.,&Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A Schools. Madison, WI: Center onOrganization and Restructuring of Schools.

Peterson, K. D.,&Finn, C. E. (1985, Spring). Principals, superintendents, and the administrator's art.The Public Interest, (79), 127-131.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn andBacon

Rodriguez, F. J. (2000, Spring). Interdisciplinary leadership in the Americas: Vision, risk, andchange. Journal of the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 64-71

Sergiovanni, T. J. Burlingame, M., Coombs, F.S.&Thurston, P.W. (1999). Educational governance and administration (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Seyfarth, J.T. (1999) The principal: New leadership for new challenges. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall, Inc.

Silver, P. (1983). Educational administration: Theoretical perspectives on practice and research.New York: Harper&Row, Publishers.

Starratt, R. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community, and excellence. NewYork: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Technology Standards for School Administrators Collaborative (TSSA) (2004). Retrieved from (External Link)

U. S. Government (2002). No child left behind act of 2001: Reauthorization of the elementary and secondaryeducation act of 1965 (P.L 107-110). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wilmore, E. L. (2002). Principal leadership: Applying the new educational leadership constituent council (ELCC)standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Organizational change in the field of education administration. OpenStax CNX. Feb 03, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10402/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Organizational change in the field of education administration' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask