# 6.8 The divergence theorem  (Page 4/12)

 Page 4 / 12

Let $\text{v}=⟨\frac{x}{z},\frac{y}{z},0⟩$ be the velocity field of a fluid. Let C be the solid cube given by $1\le x\le 4,2\le y\le 5,1\le z\le 4,$ and let S be the boundary of this cube (see the following figure). Find the flow rate of the fluid across S .

$9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{ln}\left(16\right)$

[link] illustrates a remarkable consequence of the divergence theorem. Let S be a piecewise, smooth closed surface and let F be a vector field defined on an open region containing the surface enclosed by S . If F has the form $\text{F}=⟨f\left(y,z\right),g\left(x,z\right),h\left(x,y\right)⟩,$ then the divergence of F is zero. By the divergence theorem, the flux of F across S is also zero. This makes certain flux integrals incredibly easy to calculate. For example, suppose we wanted to calculate the flux integral ${\iint }_{S}\text{F}·d\text{S}$ where S is a cube and

$\text{F}=⟨\text{sin}\left(y\right){e}^{yz},{x}^{2}{z}^{2},\text{cos}\left(xy\right){e}^{\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}x}⟩.$

Calculating the flux integral directly would be difficult, if not impossible, using techniques we studied previously. At the very least, we would have to break the flux integral into six integrals, one for each face of the cube. But, because the divergence of this field is zero, the divergence theorem immediately shows that the flux integral is zero.

We can now use the divergence theorem to justify the physical interpretation of divergence that we discussed earlier. Recall that if F is a continuous three-dimensional vector field and P is a point in the domain of F , then the divergence of F at P is a measure of the “outflowing-ness” of F at P . If F represents the velocity field of a fluid, then the divergence of F at P is a measure of the net flow rate out of point P (the flow of fluid out of P less the flow of fluid in to P ). To see how the divergence theorem justifies this interpretation, let ${B}_{r}$ be a ball of very small radius r with center P , and assume that ${B}_{r}$ is in the domain of F . Furthermore, assume that ${B}_{r}$ has a positive, outward orientation. Since the radius of ${B}_{r}$ is small and F is continuous, the divergence of F is approximately constant on ${B}_{r}.$ That is, if ${P}^{\prime }$ is any point in ${B}_{r},$ then $\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left(P\right)\approx \text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left({P}^{\prime }\right).$ Let ${S}_{r}$ denote the boundary sphere of ${B}_{r}.$ We can approximate the flux across ${S}_{r}$ using the divergence theorem as follows:

$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\iint }_{{S}_{r}}\text{F}·d\text{S}& ={\iiint }_{{B}_{r}}\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dV\hfill \\ & \approx {\iiint }_{{B}_{r}}\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left(P\right)dV\hfill \\ & =\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left(P\right)V\left({B}_{r}\right).\hfill \end{array}$

As we shrink the radius r to zero via a limit, the quantity $\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left(P\right)V\left({B}_{r}\right)$ gets arbitrarily close to the flux. Therefore,

$\text{div}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{F}\left(P\right)=\underset{r\to 0}{\text{lim}}\frac{1}{V\left({B}_{r}\right)}{\iint }_{{S}_{r}}\text{F}·d\text{S}$

and we can consider the divergence at P as measuring the net rate of outward flux per unit volume at P . Since “outflowing-ness” is an informal term for the net rate of outward flux per unit volume, we have justified the physical interpretation of divergence we discussed earlier, and we have used the divergence theorem to give this justification.

## Application to electrostatic fields

The divergence theorem has many applications in physics and engineering. It allows us to write many physical laws in both an integral form and a differential form (in much the same way that Stokes’ theorem allowed us to translate between an integral and differential form of Faraday’s law). Areas of study such as fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics have equations that describe the conservation of mass, momentum, or energy, and the divergence theorem allows us to give these equations in both integral and differential forms.

find the 15th term of the geometric sequince whose first is 18 and last term of 387
The given of f(x=x-2. then what is the value of this f(3) 5f(x+1)
hmm well what is the answer
Abhi
how do they get the third part x = (32)5/4
can someone help me with some logarithmic and exponential equations.
20/(×-6^2)
Salomon
okay, so you have 6 raised to the power of 2. what is that part of your answer
I don't understand what the A with approx sign and the boxed x mean
it think it's written 20/(X-6)^2 so it's 20 divided by X-6 squared
Salomon
I'm not sure why it wrote it the other way
Salomon
I got X =-6
Salomon
ok. so take the square root of both sides, now you have plus or minus the square root of 20= x-6
oops. ignore that.
so you not have an equal sign anywhere in the original equation?
hmm
Abhi
is it a question of log
Abhi
🤔.
Abhi
Commplementary angles
hello
Sherica
im all ears I need to learn
Sherica
right! what he said ⤴⤴⤴
Tamia
hii
Uday
what is a good calculator for all algebra; would a Casio fx 260 work with all algebra equations? please name the cheapest, thanks.
a perfect square v²+2v+_
kkk nice
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
or infinite solutions?
Kim
The answer is neither. The function, 2 = 0 cannot exist. Hence, the function is undefined.
Al
y=10×
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
how do you translate this in Algebraic Expressions
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
what's the easiest and fastest way to the synthesize AgNP?
China
Cied
types of nano material
I start with an easy one. carbon nanotubes woven into a long filament like a string
Porter
many many of nanotubes
Porter
what is the k.e before it land
Yasmin
what is the function of carbon nanotubes?
Cesar
I'm interested in nanotube
Uday
what is nanomaterials​ and their applications of sensors.
what is nano technology
what is system testing?
preparation of nanomaterial
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
what is system testing
what is the application of nanotechnology?
Stotaw
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field . 1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc 2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc 3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc. and may other field for details you can check at Google
Azam
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
Prasenjit
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change . maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
Azam
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
Prasenjit
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
Damian
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
Damian
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
Azam
Hello
Uday
I'm interested in Nanotube
Uday
this technology will not going on for the long time , so I'm thinking about femtotechnology 10^-15
Prasenjit
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Good
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!