<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

    Lens questions

  1. Assess the manifest complexity of the technology in question. For example, what is the manifest complexity of windmills? (Do they present tightly coupled systems that lead to unpredictable breakdowns?) Which is more manifestly complex, nuclear reactors or windmill turbines?
  2. Assess the concealed complexity . For example, do the operating procedures of windmills conceal complexity? Do nuclear reactors conceal complexity in the complicated regulation process that has developed between manufacturers and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission? (Maybe, complexity is concealed in the divergence between formal and informal regulatory procedures, the latter having evolved as the NRC has been "captured" by reactor manufacturers.) See Ford
  3. Technological Imperative : Does the technology redefine or displace basic human needs or basic values? Does it require that we adopt ourselves to it?
  4. Reverse Adaptation : Does the technology require reverse adaptation? If yes, are there any viable "work around" strategies that could be implemented to align better the technology's needs with our own.

What you are going to do

    Exercise one: construct a socio-technical system grid

  • Choose a test case from above. (The alternatives include Cogentrix, Copper Mining, Windmills, and Laptops.)
  • Read the module, Socio-Technical Systems in Professional Decision-Making, and modify the STS table for Puerto Rico to fit the test case you are using.
  • Identify the values embedded in the technology of your test case and the STS you have modeled.
  • Identify any possible value mismatches between the technology to be introduced and the underlying STS.

    Exercise two

  • Select two of the lenses outlined above.
  • Examine your test case under the first lens by answering the questions. Give a global assessment of whether your test case technology is acceptable under the lens.
  • Examine your test case under the second lens by answering the questions. Give a global assessment of whether your test case technology is acceptable under this second lens.
  • Compare the results of the two lenses. Discuss areas of divergence between the two lenses. Discuss the areas of convergence.

Prepatory questions and module worksheet

Technology choice preparatory questions

Technology choice worksheet

Sts presentation for technological choice

Table displaying components of stss

Presentation on capabilities approach

Technology choice jeopardies

Technological choice cases jeopardy

Socio technical systems jeopardy

Jeopardy and responsibility

Conclusion

    Evaluate the lenses

  • Which of the three lenses presented in this module would you eliminate?
  • Which lens did you find most helpful? Why?
  • Would you recommend a new lens? What is it?

    Muddy point

  • What was the most obscure or muddiest point? (What didn’t make sense to you? What did you find objectionable?)
  • What was the strongest point of this module? What did you learn? Will you be able to put it to use?

Reference

  1. Feenberg, Andrew. (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited . Oxford, UL: Oxford University Press.
  2. Feenberg, Andrew. (1999). Questioning Technology . London: Routledge.
  3. Ford, D. (1981). A Reporter At Large: Three Mile Island. In The New Yorker , April 6, 1981: 49-106.
  4. Heilbroner, R.L. (2009). Do Machines Make History? In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future , Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 97-106.
  5. Hickman, L. (1990). John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press: 140-153.
  6. Hickman, L. (2001) Philosophical Tools for Technological Culture: Putting Pragmatism to Work . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Your first item here
  7. Huff, C. and Finholt, T. (1994). Social Issues In Computing: Putting Computing in its Place . New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Mason, J. (1979). The accident that shouldn't have happened: An analysis of Three Mile Island. In IEEE Spectrum , November 1979: 33-42.
  10. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies . Basic Books.
  11. Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W. (2009). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts. In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future , Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 107-139.
  12. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Sismondo, S. (2004). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies . Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 51-52.
  14. Trent, March. (1992). The AES Corporation: Management Institute for Environment and Business. In Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 5th Edition . Donaldson, T. and Werhane, P. (Eds.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 424-440.
  15. White, Leslie. (1949). The Science of Culture . New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 366.
  16. Winner, L. (2009). Do Artifacts Have Politics? In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future , Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 209-226.
  17. Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press paperback edition.

Appendix

Practical lenses for socio-technical systems

Questions & Answers

Complementary angles
Idrissa Reply
Commplementary angles
Idrissa Reply
Complementary angles
Idrissa
hello
Sherica
im all ears I need to learn
Sherica
Complementary angles
Idrissa
yes
Sherica
what is a good calculator for all algebra; would a Casio fx 260 work with all algebra equations? please name the cheapest, thanks.
Kevin Reply
a perfect square v²+2v+_
Dearan Reply
kkk nice
Abdirahman Reply
algebra 2 Inequalities:If equation 2 = 0 it is an open set?
Kim Reply
or infinite solutions?
Kim
y=10×
Embra Reply
if |A| not equal to 0 and order of A is n prove that adj (adj A = |A|
Nancy Reply
rolling four fair dice and getting an even number an all four dice
ramon Reply
Kristine 2*2*2=8
Bridget Reply
Differences Between Laspeyres and Paasche Indices
Emedobi Reply
No. 7x -4y is simplified from 4x + (3y + 3x) -7y
Mary Reply
is it 3×y ?
Joan Reply
J, combine like terms 7x-4y
Bridget Reply
im not good at math so would this help me
Rachael Reply
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
Crystal Reply
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
Chris Reply
what is nanomaterials​ and their applications of sensors.
Ramkumar Reply
what is nano technology
Sravani Reply
what is system testing?
AMJAD
preparation of nanomaterial
Victor Reply
Yes, Nanotechnology has a very fast field of applications and their is always something new to do with it...
Himanshu Reply
good afternoon madam
AMJAD
what is system testing
AMJAD
what is the application of nanotechnology?
Stotaw
In this morden time nanotechnology used in many field . 1-Electronics-manufacturad IC ,RAM,MRAM,solar panel etc 2-Helth and Medical-Nanomedicine,Drug Dilivery for cancer treatment etc 3- Atomobile -MEMS, Coating on car etc. and may other field for details you can check at Google
Azam
anybody can imagine what will be happen after 100 years from now in nano tech world
Prasenjit
after 100 year this will be not nanotechnology maybe this technology name will be change . maybe aftet 100 year . we work on electron lable practically about its properties and behaviour by the different instruments
Azam
name doesn't matter , whatever it will be change... I'm taking about effect on circumstances of the microscopic world
Prasenjit
how hard could it be to apply nanotechnology against viral infections such HIV or Ebola?
Damian
silver nanoparticles could handle the job?
Damian
not now but maybe in future only AgNP maybe any other nanomaterials
Azam
can nanotechnology change the direction of the face of the world
Prasenjit Reply
At high concentrations (>0.01 M), the relation between absorptivity coefficient and absorbance is no longer linear. This is due to the electrostatic interactions between the quantum dots in close proximity. If the concentration of the solution is high, another effect that is seen is the scattering of light from the large number of quantum dots. This assumption only works at low concentrations of the analyte. Presence of stray light.
Ali Reply
the Beer law works very well for dilute solutions but fails for very high concentrations. why?
bamidele Reply
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Smarajit Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
QuizOver.com Reply

Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!





Source:  OpenStax, Civis project - uprm. OpenStax CNX. Nov 20, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11359/1.4
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Civis project - uprm' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask