<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Let { a n } and { b n } be sequences of complex numbers, and let { S N } denote the sequence of partial sums of the infinite series a n . Derive the Abel Summation Formula:

n = 1 N a n b n = S N b N + n = 1 N - 1 S n ( b n - b n + 1 ) .

The Comparison Test is the most powerful theorem we have about infinite series of positive terms. Of course, most series do not consist entirely of positive terms, so that the Comparison Test is not enough.The next theorem is therefore of much importance.

Alternating series test

Suppose { a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , ... } is an alternating sequence of real numbers; i.e., their signs alternate.Assume further that the sequence { | a n | } is nonincreasing with 0 = lim | a n | . Then the infinite series a n converges.

Assume, without loss of generality, that the odd terms a 2 n + 1 of the sequence { a n } are positive and the even terms a 2 n are negative. We collect some facts about the partial sums S N = a 1 + a 2 + ... + a N of the infinite series a n .

  1. Every even partial sum S 2 N is less than the following odd partial sum S 2 N + 1 = S 2 N + a 2 N + 1 , And every odd partial sum S 2 N + 1 is greater than the following even partial sum S 2 N + 2 = S 2 N + 1 + a 2 N + 2 .
  2. Every even partial sum S 2 N is less than or equal to the next even partial sum S 2 N + 2 = S 2 N + a 2 N + 1 + a 2 N + 2 , implying that the sequence of even partial sums { S 2 N } is nondecreasing.
  3. Every odd partial sum S 2 N + 1 is greater than or equal to the next odd partial sum S 2 N + 3 = S 2 N + 1 + a 2 N + 2 + a 2 N + 3 , implying that the sequence of odd partial sums { S 2 N + 1 } is nonincreasing.
  4. Every odd partial sum S 2 N + 1 is bounded below by S 2 . For, S 2 N + 1 > S 2 N S 2 . And, every even partial sum S 2 N is bounded above by S 1 . For, S 2 N < S 2 N + 1 S 1 .
  5. Therefore, the sequence { S 2 N } of even partial sums is nondecreasing and bounded above.That sequence must then have a limit, which we denote by S e . Similarly, the sequence { S 2 N + 1 } of odd partial sums is nonincreasingand bounded below. This sequence of partial sums also must have a limit, which we denote by S o .

Now

S o - S e = lim S 2 N + 1 - lim S 2 N = lim ( S 2 N + 1 - S 2 N ) = lim a 2 N + 1 = 0 ,

showing that S e = S o , and we denote this common limit by S . Finally, given an ϵ > 0 , there exists an N 1 so that | S 2 N - S | < ϵ if 2 N N 1 , and there exists an N 2 so that | S 2 N + 1 - S | < ϵ if 2 N + 1 N 2 . Therefore, if N max ( N 1 , N 2 ) , then | S N - S | < ϵ , and this proves that the infinite series converges.

  1. Show that n = 1 ( - 1 ) n / n converges, but that it is not absolutely convergent.
  2. Let { a n } be an alternating series, as in the preceding theorem. Show that the sum S = a n is trapped between S N and S N + 1 , and that | S - S N | | a N | .
  3. State and prove a theorem about “eventually alternating infinite series.”
  4. Show that z n / n converges if and only if | z | 1 , and z 1 . HINT: Use the Abel Summation Formula to evaluate the partial sums.

Let s = p / q be a positive rational number.

  1. For each x > 0 , show that there exists a unique y > 0 such that y s = x ; i.e., y p = x q .
  2. Prove that 1 / n s converges if s > 1 and diverges if s 1 . HINT: Group the terms as in part (b) of [link] .

Test for irrationality

Let x be a real number, and suppose that { p N / q N } is a sequence of rational numbers for which x = lim p N / q N and x p N / q N for any N . If lim q N | x - p N / q N | = 0 , then x is irrational.

We prove the contrapositive statement; i.e., if x = p / q is a rational number, then lim q N | x - p N / q N | 0 . We have

x - p N / q N = p / q - p N / q N = p q N - q p N q q N .

Now the numerator p q N - q p N is not 0 for any N . For, if it were, then x = p / q = p N / q N , which we have assumed not to be the case. Therefore, since p q N - q p N is an integer, we have that

| x - p N / q N | = | p q N - q p N q q N | 1 | q q N | .

So,

q N | x - p N / q N | 1 | q | ,

and this clearly does not converge to 0.

  1. Let x = n = 0 ( - 1 ) n / 2 n . Prove that x is a rational number.
  2. Let y = n = 0 ( - 1 ) n / 2 n 2 . Prove that y is an irrational number. HINT: The partial sums of this series are rational numbers.Now use the preceding theorem and part (b) of [link] .

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask