<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Solve ln ( x 3 ) 4 ln ( x ) = 1 .

x = 1 e

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

When evaluating a logarithmic function with a calculator, you may have noticed that the only options are log 10 or log, called the common logarithm , or ln , which is the natural logarithm. However, exponential functions and logarithm functions can be expressed in terms of any desired base b . If you need to use a calculator to evaluate an expression with a different base, you can apply the change-of-base formulas first. Using this change of base, we typically write a given exponential or logarithmic function in terms of the natural exponential and natural logarithmic functions.

Rule: change-of-base formulas

Let a > 0 , b > 0 , and a 1 , b 1 .

  1. a x = b x log b a for any real number x .
    If b = e , this equation reduces to a x = e x log e a = e x ln a .
  2. log a x = log b x log b a for any real number x > 0 .
    If b = e , this equation reduces to log a x = ln x ln a .

Proof

For the first change-of-base formula, we begin by making use of the power property of logarithmic functions. We know that for any base b > 0 , b 1 , log b ( a x ) = x log b a . Therefore,

b log b ( a x ) = b x log b a .

In addition, we know that b x and log b ( x ) are inverse functions. Therefore,

b log b ( a x ) = a x .

Combining these last two equalities, we conclude that a x = b x log b a .

To prove the second property, we show that

( log b a ) · ( log a x ) = log b x .

Let u = log b a , v = log a x , and w = log b x . We will show that u · v = w . By the definition of logarithmic functions, we know that b u = a , a v = x , and b w = x . From the previous equations, we see that

b u v = ( b u ) v = a v = x = b w .

Therefore, b u v = b w . Since exponential functions are one-to-one, we can conclude that u · v = w .

Changing bases

Use a calculating utility to evaluate log 3 7 with the change-of-base formula presented earlier.

Use the second equation with a = 3 and e = 3 :

log 3 7 = ln 7 ln 3 1.77124 .

Got questions? Get instant answers now!
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Use the change-of-base formula and a calculating utility to evaluate log 4 6 .

1.29248

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Chapter opener: the richter scale for earthquakes

A photograph of an earthquake fault.
(credit: modification of work by Robb Hannawacker, NPS)

In 1935, Charles Richter developed a scale (now known as the Richter scale ) to measure the magnitude of an earthquake . The scale is a base-10 logarithmic scale, and it can be described as follows: Consider one earthquake with magnitude R 1 on the Richter scale and a second earthquake with magnitude R 2 on the Richter scale. Suppose R 1 > R 2 , which means the earthquake of magnitude R 1 is stronger, but how much stronger is it than the other earthquake? A way of measuring the intensity of an earthquake is by using a seismograph to measure the amplitude of the earthquake waves. If A 1 is the amplitude measured for the first earthquake and A 2 is the amplitude measured for the second earthquake, then the amplitudes and magnitudes of the two earthquakes satisfy the following equation:

R 1 R 2 = log 10 ( A 1 A 2 ) .

Consider an earthquake that measures 8 on the Richter scale and an earthquake that measures 7 on the Richter scale. Then,

8 7 = log 10 ( A 1 A 2 ) .

Therefore,

log 10 ( A 1 A 2 ) = 1 ,

which implies A 1 / A 2 = 10 or A 1 = 10 A 2 . Since A 1 is 10 times the size of A 2 , we say that the first earthquake is 10 times as intense as the second earthquake. On the other hand, if one earthquake measures 8 on the Richter scale and another measures 6, then the relative intensity of the two earthquakes satisfies the equation

log 10 ( A 1 A 2 ) = 8 6 = 2 .

Therefore, A 1 = 100 A 2 . That is, the first earthquake is 100 times more intense than the second earthquake.

How can we use logarithmic functions to compare the relative severity of the magnitude 9 earthquake in Japan in 2011 with the magnitude 7.3 earthquake in Haiti in 2010?

To compare the Japan and Haiti earthquakes, we can use an equation presented earlier:

9 7.3 = log 10 ( A 1 A 2 ) .

Therefore, A 1 / A 2 = 10 1.7 , and we conclude that the earthquake in Japan was approximately 50 times more intense than the earthquake in Haiti.

Got questions? Get instant answers now!
Got questions? Get instant answers now!
Practice Key Terms 7

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Calculus volume 1. OpenStax CNX. Feb 05, 2016 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11964/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Calculus volume 1' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask